Land North Of Cox Ley Cox Ley Hatfield Heath Hertfordshire Data via plota.co.uk

UTT/26/0774/NMA - Non Material Amendment Approved
Admin / procedural

Proposal

Non Material Amendment to - to plots 11 and 12: using permeable tarmac in lieu of permeable block paving to parking spaces, changing fascias soffits and bargeboards to white, UPVC windows and composite door sets in lieu of timber, using large format concrete interlocking roof tiles in lieu of plain tiles and slates Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
26 Mar 2026
✓
Approved
5 May 2026

Approved on 5 May 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Documents 7

Decision & officer reports 1

PDF ANMAZ - APPROVAL NMA Decision Notice · 5 May 2026 View ↗

Plans & drawings 2

PDF PLOT 11 PROPOSED PLANS AND ELEVATIONS B020-Plan · 26 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PLOT 12 PROPOSED PLANS AND ELEVATIONS B020-Plan · 26 Mar 2026 View ↗

Application forms 1

PDF APPLICATION FORM B610-Supporting information · 26 Mar 2026 View ↗

Other documents 3

PDF OTHER B110-Officers Reports · 5 May 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSTR - CONSTRAINTS LIST Report · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF ACKAPP STANDARD ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Correspondence · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 10

Site constraints 5

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Protected tree 7 m away: 33 Individual, 5 Groups, order 8/98/52-4407
Named in a tree preservation order: work to it, its roots included, needs the council's consent first.
Root protection areas reach up to 15 m from a large tree, so an extension or new foundations this close usually needs a tree survey. Only some councils publish their single trees, and a position can be approximate: the order at the council is the definitive record, and no tree shown is not proof there is none.
Tree record ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Inside the Hatfield Heath built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 2, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Uttlesford - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Nearby new applications

14 Sept 2026Pending

11 Clipped Hedge Hatfield Heath Essex CM22 7EG

Demolition of single-storey conservatory and erection of replacement single-stor...

UTT/26/2365/HHF
14 Sept 2026Pending

Land To The West Of Mill Lane Hatfield Heath

Application to discharge condition 5 (materials), condition 7 (historic building...

UTT/26/2359/DOC
17 Aug 2026Pending

16 Little Heath Hatfield Heath Essex CM22 7EP

1 no. Oak - reduce the crown by up to 3 metres and deadwood as tree is starting ...

UTT/26/2092/TPO
13 Aug 2026Approved

Land North Of Cox Ley Cox Ley Hatfield Heath Hertfordshire

Non-material amendment to UTT/20/0422/FUL - using Ibstock Ivanhoe Westminster in...

UTT/26/2085/NMA
13 Aug 2026Pending

Land To The West Of Mill Lane Hatfield Heath Essex CM22 7AA

S73 application to vary condition 2 (approved plans) attached to UTT/24/0103/PIN...

UTT/26/2058/FUL
31 Jul 2026Pending

Land North Of Cox Ley Cox Ley Hatfield Heath Hertfordshire

Request to vary S106 agreement dated 17th October 2022 relating to UTT/20/0422/F...

UTT/26/1950/DOV

Important details

Council
Uttlesford
Application type
Non Material Amendment
Postcode
CM22 7ER
Received
26 Mar 2026
Validated
26 Mar 2026
Ward
Hatfield Heath
Parish
Hatfield Heath
Case officer
Show
Target decision
23 Apr 2026
Decision
Approve
Decision date
5 May 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
LBF Architects Ltd

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14810660
Planning Portal ref
PP-14810660
Statutory expiry
23 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No

Historical activity at this location

13 nearby applications on record - archival context, not part of the live application.

Within ~100m

Nearby activity

2025
31 Cox Ley Hatfield Heath Essex CM22 7ER
Garage conversion to bedroom. Removal of shed to rear garden and new Garden Room/storage…
UTT/25/0759/HHF
2025
10 Cox Ley Hatfield Heath Essex CM22 7ER
First floor front and rear extension, garage conversion, new front porch and loft convers…
UTT/25/0586/HHF
2023 Approved
17 Cox Ley Hatfield Heath Essex CM22 7ER
Proposed single storey rear extension, two storey side extension and single storey front…
UTT/23/1266/HHF
2023 Approved
17 Cox Ley Hatfield Heath Essex CM22 7ER
Proposed single storey rear extension, two storey side extension and single storey front…
UTT/23/1266/HHF
2021 Approved
5 Cox Ley Hatfield Heath CM22 7ER
Proposed demolition of garage and erection of two storey side extension and single storey…
UTT/21/3369/HHF
2019 Approved
14 Broomfields Hatfield Heath CM22 7EH
Demolition of existing side outbuilding and erection of rear extension and side extension…
UTT/19/2345/HHF
2019 Approved
14 Broomfields Hatfield Heath CM22 7EH
Demolition of existing side outbuilding and erection of rear extension and side extension…
UTT/19/2345/HHF
2017 Approved
19 Cox Ley Hatfield Heath CM22 7ER
Proposed erection of two storey side extensions, single and two storey rear extensions an…
UTT/17/1052/HHF
2017 Approved
19 Cox Ley Hatfield Heath CM22 7ER
Proposed erection of two storey side extensions, single and two storey rear extensions an…
UTT/17/1052/HHF
2017 Approved
5 Cox Ley Hatfield Heath Bishops Stortford Hertfordshire CM22 7ER
Demolish and replace garage with front and rear single storey extension and two storey ga…
UTT/17/0784/HHF
2017 Approved
5 Cox Ley Hatfield Heath Bishops Stortford Hertfordshire CM22 7ER
Demolish and replace garage with front and rear single storey extension and two storey ga…
UTT/17/0784/HHF
2016 Refused
19 Cox Ley Hatfield Heath CM22 7ER
Proposed erection of two storey side extensions, single and two storey rear extensions an…
UTT/16/3054/HHF
2016 Approved
11 Cox Ley Hatfield Heath Bishops Stortford Hertfordshire CM22 7ER
Proposed two storey side extension.
UTT/16/0408/HHF
Uttlesford
Planning Authority Score
6.2/10
Average
#95 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Uttlesford is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #31 out of 296. Only 25% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Uttlesford is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Uttlesford decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
77%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #280 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #272 of 296
82%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #31 of 296
25%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #33 of 296
71%
Minor dwellings approved
276 decided (1-9 homes)
87%
Major dwellings approved
23 decided (10+ homes)
64%
Change of use approved
28 decided
1,247
Total decisions
288 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings