House extension amendments at 44 Minterne Road, Christchurch
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Bcp Eastern BCP Planning Committee on 25 Jun 2026.
Site and surroundings
The site is a bungalow in a residential cul-de-sac with mixed houses and bungalows, off-road parking and partial future high-risk flood zone coverage.
“The application site lies within a cul de sac within the residential area of Stanpit. The surrounding area is characterised by a mix of two storey houses and bungalows. Minterne Road is characterised by predominantly detached single storey bungalows and chalet bungalows. These bungalows are varied in terms of scale, design, style and massing. 4. The application site comprised of a hipped roof bungalow and is typical of the surrounding development in the road.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
An earlier house remodelling permission was granted, while two related applications were refused and an appeal was dismissed.
“P/25/00365/HOU (appeal) 44 Minterne Road Christchurch BH23 3LE Bungalow re- modelling. Demolish Garage, erect side & rear extensions, enlarge roof to form first floor accommodation.”
“Refused 13/05/25 8/24/0720/HOU 44 Minterne Road Christchurch BH23 3LE Demolition of existing garage. Erection of 2 storey side extension, single storey rear extension & creation of 1st floor accommodation Refused 20/02/25 8/24/0318/HOU 44 Minterne Road Christchurch BH23 3LE Alterations and remodel of the existing dwelling inclusive of demolition of the existing garage, single storey rear and side extension and Granted 30/09/24”
Officer report
Main planning issues
The report considered effects on the area’s character, neighbours, flood risk, parking and highway safety.
“The key issues involved with this proposal are: • The impact upon the character of the area • The impact on neighbours’ living conditions • Flood Risk • Parking and Highway Safety…”
“These issues will be considered along with other matters relevant to this proposal below.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Wessex Water and the town council made no comments, and no third-party representations were received.
“For the purposes of this application, in accordance with section 17 Crime and Disorder Act 1998, due regard has been had to, including the need to do all that can reasonably be done to prevent, (a) crime and disorder in its area (including anti-social and other behaviour adversely affecting the local environment); (b) the misuse of drugs, alcohol and other substances in its area; and (c) re-offending in its area. 8.”
“No third-party representations have been received. Key Issue(s)”
Officer report
Who spoke
No objectors, applicant supporters or ward councillors were registered to speak.
Committee decision
The committee unanimously granted permission in accordance with the officer’s recommendation.
“Resolved to GRANT permission in accordance with the recommendation set out in the officer’s report…”
Minutes
Sources
- Bcp Eastern BCP Planning Committee minutes, 25 June 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Bcp's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Bcp Eastern BCP Planning Committee
- Council
- Bcp
- Date
- Thursday 25 June 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Bcp committee decisions →
This committee's year
24 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 5 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.