44 Minterne Road Christchurch BH23 3LE Data via plota.co.uk

P/26/01738/CONDR - Removal or Variation of Condition Approved

Proposal

Variation of condition 3 (Approved Plans) and condition 5 (Obscure Glazing of Windows – No Further Windows) of planning permission (Alterations and remodel of the existing dwelling inclusive of demolition of the existing garage, single storey rear and side extension and creation of first floor accommodation) to reduce the size of the side extension; reduce the size of the dormer; amendments to fenestration and external facing materials, additional rooflights on NW and SE elevation. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
16 Apr 2026
✓
Committee
25 Jun 2026
✓
Approved
26 Jun 2026

Approved on 26 Jun 2026 · Committee · Last checked 1 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by BCP Eastern BCP Planning Committee on 25 Jun 2026.

Approved unanimously

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the changes would not harm the area’s appearance or neighbours’ living conditions.
  • No consultees or third parties submitted comments or representations, and no speakers were registered.
  • The committee unanimously granted permission in accordance with the officer’s recommendation.
Read how the committee decided The proposed changes, site history, officers’ assessment, consultation responses, public representations and committee decision. Includes the meeting recording

Source: Plota analysis of BCP's committee minutes of 25 Jun 2026.

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    Fullcouncil archive

    Conditions variation sought for 3, 5

    • VariationVariation of condition 3 (Approved Plans) and condition 5 (Obscure Glazing of Windows – No…This applicationP/26/01738/CONDR

Site constraints 6

Article 4 direction
Hovercraft in the Solent. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Local nature reserve about 148 m away: Stanpit Marsh, Christchurch
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
SSSI about 153 m away: Christchurch Harbour SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Also on the record
Inside the Christchurch (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) built-up area; Conservation area about 99 m away: Stanpit and Fishermans Bank.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 1

Last sold for £500,000 in November 2023. Detached house, freehold.

23 November 2023£500,000

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Work with planning data?

Every application in BCP - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
BCP
Application type
Removal or Variation of Condition
Postcode
BH23 3LE
Received
16 Apr 2026
Validated
16 Apr 2026
Ward
Mudeford, Stanpit & West Highcliffe
Parish
Christchurch Town Council
Case officer
Show
Decision
Granted
Decision date
26 Jun 2026
Decision level
Committee
Applicant
Show

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
20 Apr 2026
Comments by
22 May 2026
Committee
25 Jun 2026
BCP
Planning Authority Score
1.7/10
Poor
#279 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

BCP is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #256 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 60% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (88%) than the national average (90%).

Frequently extends decision deadlines
expect longer than the statutory limit
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
BCP decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
83%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #233 of 296
88%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #214 of 296
44%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #256 of 296
60%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #267 of 296
67%
Minor dwellings approved
346 decided (1-9 homes)
68%
Major dwellings approved
56 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
78 decided
2,244
Total decisions
392 refused in the year to March 2026

Sale prices: Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.