170A High Street Rickmansworth Hertfordshire WD3 1BA Data via plota.co.uk

26/1287/TCA - Works to trees in a conservation area Approved

Proposal

Tree number - T1 Tree type - Plum (Prunus cerasifera) Approx Height - 7m Location - Front garden Service - Crown Reduction Work required- Reduce crown all round by upto 1.5m and prune best form. Remove water shoots, from main stem. Sever and clear a 0.3m section of ivy from the circumference of the stem. Crown lift to approximately 3.5m. Reason - As part of regular maintenance, to relieve end weight from leaning stems. Priority code - On Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
11 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
1 Sept 2026

Approved on 1 Sept 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 7 Sept 2026

Site constraints 6

Rickmansworth Town Centre conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Local nature reserve about 285 m away: Rickmansworth Aquadrome
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Also on the record
2 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin; Radon affected area, class 2; National infrastructure project about 659 m away: Expansion of Heathrow Airport (Third Runway), at pre-application; Inside the Rickmansworth built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Three Rivers - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Works to trees in a conservation area
Postcode
WD3 1BA
Received
11 Aug 2026
Validated
11 Aug 2026
Ward
Rickmansworth Town
Parish
Batchworth Community Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
22 Sept 2026
Decision
Consent given on work to Tree apps
Decision date
1 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 21 days from validation, 7 days faster than Three Rivers's median of 28 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 89% of tree and landscaping works here are.

92%decided within 8 weeks
89%approved
322decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Three Rivers in the last twelve months, from validation. Three Rivers decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 7 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15150187
Planning Portal ref
PP-15150187
Statutory expiry
22 Sept 2026
Env. assessment
No
Three Rivers
Planning Authority Score
7.3/10
Good
#54 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Three Rivers is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #30 out of 296. Only 24% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Three Rivers decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #145 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #184 of 296
82%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #30 of 296
24%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #28 of 296
85%
Minor dwellings approved
62 decided (1-9 homes)
63%
Major dwellings approved
8 decided (10+ homes)
94%
Change of use approved
17 decided
819
Total decisions
86 refused in the year to March 2026