Four holiday cabins at Land South Of Bwlch Y Ffridd, Newtown

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Powys Planning, Taxi Licensing & Rights of Way Committee on 3 Sept 2026.

25/1690/FULApproved

What was proposed

The application proposed four holiday cabins, a new access, a package treatment plant and associated works.

“Application Number: 25/1690/FUL Grid Ref: E: 308172 N: 294901 Community Council: Aberhafesp Community Valid Date: 15.01.2026”

“Proposal: Proposed tourism of 4 holiday cabins, new access, package treatment plant and all associated works…”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the development was considered acceptable in principle, in design, landscape, highways, drainage, ecology and residential amenity terms.

“Based upon the LANDMAP classifications and information, the proposed design and layout of the units, that the site would be relatively well screened by existing vegetation and that landscape planting is proposed, it is not considered that the development would have an unacceptable adverse impact upon the identified public rights of way as recreational assets or the valued characteristics and qualities of the landscape or detract from the overall character and appearance of…”

“Noise Generally, tourism accommodation developments are not considered to be incompatible with neighbouring permanent residential uses. Although it is appreciated that the development would generate some additional noise in terms of additional persons on site and additional traffic, it is not considered that this would be at a level which would create a statutory noise nuisance.”

Officer report

What consultees said

The latest highway response raised no objection subject to conditions, while environmental, ecological, drainage and sewerage consultees also raised no objection or gave advice.

“Natural Resources Wales (Mid Wales) DPAS 4th Feb 2026 We have no objection to the proposed development as submitted and provide the following advice. Foul Drainage We understand that the development is not served by the public foul sewer and that the application form indicates that foul drainage is to be discharged to a private sewerage system.”

Officer report

What people said

Objections concerned publicity, lighting, amenity, noise, ecology, highways, parking, management, land ownership, pollution and possible future impacts; two letters supported the development.

“- Publicity of the application - Lighting (external, and internal light spill) - Impact upon amenity of neighbouring properties (noise, overlooking, light) - Height and number of units - Ecology - Number of parking spaces - Electricity supply - Highway safety - Risk of livestock worrying - Potential for future development - Visibility of the development from wider area - Overdevelopment - Pollution from swimming pool chemicals - Management of the holiday units - Land…”

Officer report

Members’ discussion

Members discussed passing bays, highway safety, flooding and the ecological assessment, and requested an additional signage condition.

“Members sought clarification on the proposed relocation and adequacy of the passing bays, together with wider highway safety concerns, Officers confirmed that the detailed location of the passing bays would be subject to further approval through the discharge of conditions process and that the Highway Authority maintained no objection to the proposal.”

“A member queried the inconsistencies on flooding between local evidence and National Resources Wales, the Officer noted that the NRW flood maps do not identify the site as being at risk of flooding, and that the development would require Sustainable Drainage Approval Body (SAAB) approval.”

Minutes

The committee vote

The application was moved and seconded for approval as recommended by the officer.

“It was moved and duly seconded to approve the application as recommended by the officer.”

Minutes

The decision

The committee granted consent subject to the report’s conditions and an additional signage scheme condition delegated to the Chair and Vice Chair with professional consultation.

“RESOLVED: Reason for decision: That the application be granted consent, subject to the conditions set out in the report which is filed with the signed minutes and to include a signage scheme condition with authority to be delegated to the Chair and Vice Chair, in consultation with the Lead Professional. As officer’s recommendation as set out in the report which is filed with the signed minutes.”

Minutes

The members' reasons

“Members were satisfied with the responses provided but resolved to include an additional condition requiring the submission of a signage scheme in the interests of highway safety.”

Minutes

Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.

Sources

  • Powys Planning, Taxi Licensing & Rights of Way Committee minutes, 3 September 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Powys's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Powys
Date
Thursday 3 September 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

31 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →