Old Meadows Bramley Road Silchester Reading Hampshire RG7 2LL Data via plota.co.uk

T/00308/26/TCA - Works to Trees - Conservation Areas Approved

Proposal

T1 - 1 x Scots Pine - FELL to ground level T2 - group (mix of yew, laurel, silver birch, hazel, field maple) - Crown Lift to 5-6ms over carriageway Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
10 Jul 2026
Approved
4 Aug 2026

Approved on 4 Aug 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 6 Aug 2026

Site constraints 5

Grade II listed: Old Meadows
List entry 1339598 · 7 m from the pin · 2 more listed buildings within 150 m (2 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 2 with distances
Historic England ↗
Silchester conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Priority habitat 21 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Basingstoke - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Works to Trees - Conservation Areas
Postcode
RG7 2LL
Received
10 Jul 2026
Validated
10 Jul 2026
Ward
Bramley
Parish
SILCHESTER CP
Case officer
Show
Target decision
21 Aug 2026
Decision
Raise No Objection
Decision date
4 Aug 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
Oakey Tree Services Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 25 days from validation, about the council's usual 28 days. Approved, as 94% of tree and landscaping works here are.

98%decided within 8 weeks
94%approved
278decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Basingstoke in the last twelve months, from validation. Basingstoke decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 6 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Env. assessment
No
Basingstoke
Planning Authority Score
5.1/10
Average
#143 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Basingstoke ranks #189 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Basingstoke decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #75 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #49 of 296
59%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #189 of 296
46%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #198 of 296
75%
Minor dwellings approved
150 decided (1-9 homes)
63%
Major dwellings approved
19 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
32 decided
1,076
Total decisions
90 refused in the year to March 2026