57-69 Goodlands Vale, Hedge End Data via plota.co.uk

T/26/102207 - TPO Application Valid - Awaiting Decision

Proposal

1no. Group of Unspecified Species (G1) - Existing overhang is relatively minor, extending approx. 2–3m over the adjoining gardens at its greatest extent. The proposed works would be limited to growth extending beyond the respective property boundaries and would not involve unnecessary removal of branches or any significant reduction in the overall tree canopy. Permission is requested to allow residents to maintain the existing overhang from the trees at Hogsty Corner back to their respective property boundary fences. Consent is requested for a period of 7 years to allow this work to be carried out as part of routine maintenance when required, without the need for a new application each time. Pruning Specification * Pruning will be limited to branches and growth extending beyond the respective property boundary. * The pruning line will generally follow the existing boundary fence. * Branches will be pruned back to suitable growth points or branch unions, rather than simply cut back to the boundary. * No topping, pollarding or general crown reduction will be undertaken. * The overall form, health and structural integrity of the trees will be retained. * Where practical, works will be carried out in accordance with good arboricultural practice and with regard to the condition and growth characteristics of the individual trees. The proposed approach would: * Reduce the risk of branch failure over the gardens. *Allow the trees to be managed regularly and proactively, rather than allowing the overhang to become more extensive before work is undertaken. * Reduce the likelihood of more significant pruning being required in the future. * Keep growth from encroaching further over gardens while retaining the trees and their amenity and biodiversity value. * Give residents a clear and consistent approach to managing the overhang. * Avoid the need for repeated applications for what would otherwise be routine and proportionate maintenance. * Maintain a consistent pruning line and help avoid excessive pruning. A seven-year period is considered appropriate as the trees and their relationship with the adjoining boundaries are unlikely to change significantly over this period. It should provide a consistent approach to managing the overhang while still allowing the trees and the effectiveness of the pruning regime to be reviewed before any further long-term consent is considered. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
29 Sept 2026
Decision
Expected by 24 Nov 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision around 9 Nov 2026, from Eastleigh's recent tree and landscaping works.

Comments are open until 30 Oct 2026

Comment on this application ↗

Site constraints 5

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Solent: Includes Chichester and Langstone Harbours SPA/Ramsar, Solent and Southampton Water SPA/Ramsar, Solent Maritime SAC, Portsmouth Harbour SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Local nature reserve about 36 m away: Wildern
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Also on the record
Inside the Hedge End built-up area; Priority habitat about 36 m away: Deciduous woodland; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 8 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Eastleigh - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Eastleigh
Application type
TPO
Received
29 Sept 2026
Validated
29 Sept 2026
Ward
Hedge End South Ward
Parish
Hedge End CP
Target decision
24 Nov 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

Decision outlook

Day 10 of the 56-day target. Eastleigh usually decides tree and landscaping works by day 41.

Day 1046 days to the 56-day target
97%decided within 8 weeks
93%approved
261decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Eastleigh in the last twelve months, from validation. Eastleigh decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
30 Oct 2026
Eastleigh
Planning Authority Score
6.8/10
Good
#67 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Eastleigh is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #94 out of 296. Only 27% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Eastleigh decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
90%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #111 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #153 of 296
73%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #94 of 296
27%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #40 of 296
63%
Minor dwellings approved
30 decided (1-9 homes)
67%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
91%
Change of use approved
11 decided
547
Total decisions
55 refused in the year to March 2026