97 Marton Gate Bridlington East Riding Of Yorkshire YO16 6YE Data via plota.co.uk

26/00477/TPO - Works to Protected Trees Approved

Proposal

TPO - BRIDLINGTON NO. 27 - 2008 (REF 1143) A1 - Crown reduce 1 no. Sycamore tree (T1) by removing 1 no. primary limb from eastern side and reduce tertiary limbs by 2.5m on eastern side as illustrated to provide more clearance from building and mitigate against limb failure due to some stem decay and fungus on main stem; Crown lift 1 no. Lime tree (T2) to 6.5m, thin crown by removing thatch of epicormic growth, and reduce northern side by 3m due to request from resident to reduce overhang to neighbouring property; Crown lift 1 no. Fir tree (T3) to 6.5m and reduce higher northern canopy by 2.5m due to request from resident to reduce overhang to neighbouring property; Crown lift 1 no. Lime tree (T4) to 5m and thin crown by removing epicormic growth due to request from resident to reduce overhang from neighbouring property; Crown reduce 1 no. Pine tree (T5) by removing 1 no. vulnerable northerly limb due to request from resident to reduce overhang from neighbouring property… Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗

Application progress

Received
24 Feb 2026
Approved
2 Apr 2026

Approved on 2 Apr 2026 · Delegated TREE Decision JW · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Work with planning data? Every application in East Riding - and every UK council - as a live feed or API. About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Works to Protected Trees
Postcode
YO16 6YE
Received
24 Feb 2026
Validated
24 Feb 2026
Ward
Bridlington North
Parish
Bridlington Town Council
Case officer
Show
Decision
TPO Granted (Prune)
Decision date
2 Apr 2026
Decision level
Delegated TREE Decision JW
Applicant
Show
Agent
Wold Trees Ltd

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14731844
Comments by
20 Mar 2026
Env. assessment
No
East Riding
Planning Authority Score
8.1/10
Excellent
#24 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

East Riding is one of the fastest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #7 out of 296. Only 14% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Among the fastest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
East Riding decision performance
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
90%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #110 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #152 of 296
95%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #7 of 296
14%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #9 of 296
76%
Minor dwellings approved
190 decided (1-9 homes)
95%
Major dwellings approved
42 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
79 decided
1,887
Total decisions
198 refused in the year to March 2026