Bandstand and decking at Opposite 91 The Esplanade, Weymouth

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Dorset Western and Southern Area Planning Committee on 7 May 2026.

P/FUL/2026/00467Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed a bandstand with associated decking on the promenade.

“Description of development 5.1 The promenade would be extended with a 25sqm timber deck supported by a metal frame adjacent to the existing ramp to provide a base for the bandstand at the promenade level. The bandstand would be hexagonal in shape and be constructed of metal with the detailing of the columns and metal work matching the existing railings and the Victorian shelters on the Esplanade. The roof would be clad in metal (lead).”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site is on the Esplanade opposite the Royal Hotel, beside an existing shelter and the American D-Day War Memorial.

“Description of site 4.1 The site is located on the promenade (known as the Esplanade) opposite the Royal Hotel (91 The Esplanade) between one of the existing shelters and the American D-Day War…”

Officer report

Earlier planning history

An earlier proposal concerned restoration of the American War Memorial and a new bandstand.

“Background and relevant planning history P/PAP/2025/00028 - Decision Date: 08/04/2025 Restoration of American War Memorial and new Bandstand…”

Officer report

The officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended permission because the proposal would provide community and tourism benefits and would comply with relevant planning policies.

“Reason application is going to committee: The application is on land owned by Dorset Council. Summary of recommendation: GRANT subject to conditions as set out at the end of this report. Key planning issues…”

“Issue Conclusion Principle of development The proposal which leads to a new local community structure and tourism attraction which would comply with local plan policies COM2 and ECON5 and Weymouth Neighbourhood Plan policies W39 and W41 and paragraph 98 of the National Planning Policy Framework.”

Officer report

Design, heritage and flooding

The proposal was assessed as acceptable in design, heritage and flood-risk terms, subject to conditions on materials, colour and emergency arrangements.

“It identifies that the area is rich in iron work including the Jubilee Clock and the Esplanade shelters which are good examples of cast ironwork, produced by national manufacturers. The proposal would be within the setting of these heritage assets. The proposal would be of a traditional bandstand design and would incorporate a design and materials matching the Victorian shelters and the existing railings on the Esplanade.”

Officer report

Consultees’ views

The Coastal Risk Management team and Environment Agency did not object, while the Conservation Officer sought a traditional roof material and agreed colour scheme.

“Consultations All consultee responses can be viewed in full on the website. Consultees 8.1 Dorset Council Asset & Property - No reply. Dorset Council Conservation Officer – No objection provided the roof is a traditional material and not metal. Colour scheme for the bandstand should be agreed by condition. Dorset Council Coastal risk management - No objection. Dorset Council Rights of Way Officer – No reply. Environment Agency – No objection.”

“Cllr Orrell, Melcombe Regis Ward – Looks to be in keeping with other structures on the prom. Design will not block views from hotels to any significant degree. Weymouth Town Council – Supports the application on the grounds of economic benefits and for aesthetic reasons, feeling that it will add vibrancy to the seafront.”

Officer report

Public comments

Two objections, four expressions of support and one comment were received, covering funding, behaviour, damage, beach space, maintenance, size and economic benefits.

“Total - objections Total - No objections Total - comments 2 4 1”

“Summary of comments of objections: Funding could be better spent (suggestions made on what); Encourage antisocial behaviour; Will be damaged by sea; Take up beach space; Another bandstand available at Greenhill (no need for another). Summary of comments of support: Beneficial for the economy of the town, visitors, performing bands and the community; Enhance seaside heritage.”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The application was granted subject to conditions controlling the approved plans, implementation period, materials, colour and flood response arrangements.

“Summary of Recommendation: Grant subject to conditions. Decision: That the application be granted subject to the following conditions.”

“No development shall be commenced until details of the finished paint colour for the bandstand have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Thereafter the development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details. Reason: To safeguard the setting of listed buildings and preserve the character or appearance of the Conservation Area.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Dorset Western and Southern Area Planning Committee minutes, 7 May 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Dorset's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Dorset
Date
Thursday 7 May 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

25 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →