Detached rear garage at 21 Murrayfield Avenue, Edinburgh
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 16 Sept 2026.
What is proposed
The application proposes a detached garage and associated terraced area in the rear garden, with amended design features and landscaping works.
“The application site forms part of a terrace of two-storey and attic, two-bay houses on Murrayfield Avenue. The application relates to the rear garden area which backs onto a service lane off Henderland Road. An existing garage to the rear of the garden was previously demolished and hardstanding now exists in its place which forms a raised terrace area. There is currently a timber gate to access the garden from the rear service lane.”
“The application proposes the erection of a detached garage within the rear garden and an associated terraced area.”
Officer report
Officers’ recommendation
Officers recommended granting consent because the proposals would not harm the listed building, its setting or the conservation area.
“It is recommended that this application be Granted subject to the details below.”
“The proposals have special regard to the desirability of preserving the building and its setting and will not adversely impact on its special architectural and historic interest. The proposals will preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area. It is acceptable with regards to Section 14 and Section 64 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) (Scotland) Act 1997. There are no material considerations that outweigh this conclusion.”
Officer report
Public response
Twenty objections were received, including concerns about the garage’s design, heritage impact, green space, privacy, traffic and possible alternative use.
“- The proposed garage is of an unacceptable design as the pitched roof would be out of character with the existing character of the lane. - The proposed garage would harm the character and setting of the listed building. - The proposed garage would harm the character and appearance of the conservation area. - The proposals would result in harm to existing green space within the rear garden.”
“- The proposed garage would adversely impact on play and light to the adjacent tennis club. - The size and design of the proposed building means it may be used for another use other than a garage. - The proposals would hinder sports facilities within the neighbourhood. - The proposals would result in a loss of privacy to neighbouring properties. - The proposed garage would result in increased traffic which would threaten the safety of pedestrians and road users.”
Officer report
Heritage assessment
The proposed flat-roofed garage, terrace, materials and timber screens were assessed as compatible with the lane and acceptable for the listed building and conservation area.
“A terraced area is proposed to be formed off from the garage to give access to the garden and to correspond with the existing level changes. The terrace has been reduced in scale from the original proposals, and the design of the terrace would be sensitive to the setting of the listed building. There is an existing raised terrace to the rear of the garden which has a timber fence running the length of the terrace, and this has approval.”
“The proposed garage would be in-keeping with the immediate context of the service lane and the existing pattern of development to the rear gardens along this terrace. The single storey garage would have a flat roof and would be of an acceptable design which would be compatible with the utilitarian character of the service lane.”
Officer report
Committee decision
The application was granted subject to the conditions, reasons and informatives set out for the consent.
“26/02075/LBC - Report by the Chief Planning Officer To GRANT the application subject to the conditions, reasons and informatives as set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer. 4.9 – Flat 5, 8 Porteous' Pend, Old Town Retrospective change of use of premises to short term let accommodation – Application no.”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Hal OslerChairLib Dem
- Max MitchellVice-ChairConservative
- Chas BoothGreen
- Christopher CowdyConservative
- Joan GriffithsLabour
- David KeySNP
- Martha Mattos CoelhoSNP
- Amy McNeese-MechanSNP
- Tim PogsonLabour
- Alex StaniforthGreen
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 16 September 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Edinburgh
- Date
- Wednesday 16 September 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Councillors
- 10SNP 3Conservative 2Green 2Labour 2Lib Dem 1Show councillors
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Edinburgh committee decisions →
This committee's year
259 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.