Dogs Trust Canterbury Radfall Road Chestfield Kent CT5 3ER Data via plota.co.uk

CA/26/00014 - Works to a tree with a TPO Approved

Proposal

T.P.O No 1 1957, 14 Betula pendula - fell to ground level, G1 group of 6 Leylandii - reduce below electric cables, 31 Betula pendula - fell to ground level, 35 Sweet Chestnut - monolith at 7m, 39 Betula pendula - fell to ground level, 67 Prunus avium - remove secondary stem, 69 Betula pendula - dead tree - fell to ground level. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
5 Jan 2026
✓
Approved
26 Feb 2026

Approved on 26 Feb 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 7 Jul 2026

Site constraints 7

Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. A site survey can differ.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Public footpath about 20 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
SSSI about 35 m away: West Blean and Thornden Woods SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Habitat network: Restorable Habitat
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Priority habitat about 20 m away: Deciduous woodland; Tree preservation order about 25 m away: Lypeat Wood Chestfield; Open access land about 30 m away: Access Land - Combined Open Country, Registered Common Land and Section 16 Dedicated Land. MoD Byelaw, Section 28 Exclusions, Racecourses and Aerodromes and ECP Margin have been removed..
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Canterbury - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Canterbury
Application type
Works to a tree with a TPO
Postcode
CT5 3ER
Received
5 Jan 2026
Validated
5 Jan 2026
Ward
Chestfield
Parish
Chestfield
Case officer
Show
Target decision
2 Mar 2026
Decision
GRANTED
Decision date
26 Feb 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
All Aspects Tree Services Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 52 days from validation, 18 days slower than Canterbury's median of 34 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 100% of tree and landscaping works here are.

99%decided within 8 weeks
100%approved
382decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Canterbury in the last twelve months, from validation. Canterbury decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
2 Mar 2026
Canterbury
Planning Authority Score
4.8/10
Below average
#158 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Canterbury is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #259 out of 296. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Canterbury decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
95%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #18 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #27 of 296
43%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #259 of 296
44%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #176 of 296
84%
Minor dwellings approved
62 decided (1-9 homes)
95%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
93%
Change of use approved
29 decided
925
Total decisions
45 refused in the year to March 2026