Bickenhill Green Court Church Lane Bickenhill Solihull B92 0DN Data via plota.co.uk

PL/2026/01355/TCA - Trees in Conservation Area Approved

Proposal

T1 Lawson cypress tree, T2 Lawson cypress tree , T3 Maple tree, T4 Maple tree and T5 Leylandii tree - Fell to ground level. H1 Pyracantha hedge - Remove along front wall. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
21 Jul 2026
Consultation
22 Jul 2026
Approved
3 Sept 2026

Approved on 3 Sept 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 4 Sept 2026

Site constraints 4

Green belt: Birmingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
2 listed buildings within 150 m
Nearest: Church of Saint Peter, Grade I, 45 m away · 1 Grade I, 1 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 2 with distances
Historic England ↗
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Solihull - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Solihull
Application type
Trees in Conservation Area
Postcode
B92 0DN
Received
21 Jul 2026
Validated
21 Jul 2026
Ward
Meriden & Arden
Parish
Bickenhill Parish Council
Target decision
1 Sept 2026
Decision
Approved
Decision date
3 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
LH Tree Services Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 44 days from validation, 22 days faster than Solihull's median of 66 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 90% of tree and landscaping works here are.

46%decided within 8 weeks
90%approved
112decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Solihull in the last twelve months, from validation. Solihull decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15094916
Consultation
22 Jul 2026
Comments by
13 Aug 2026
Site or press notice
5 Aug 2026
Env. assessment
No
Solihull
Planning Authority Score
5.2/10
Average
#141 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Solihull ranks #148 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (94%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Solihull decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
94%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #44 of 296
94%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #116 of 296
65%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #148 of 296
41%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #160 of 296
87%
Minor dwellings approved
53 decided (1-9 homes)
88%
Major dwellings approved
8 decided (10+ homes)
90%
Change of use approved
51 decided
1,118
Total decisions
71 refused in the year to March 2026