Claybury Hall, Regents Drive, Woodford Green Data via plota.co.uk

2346/26 - Works to TPO Tree(s) Approved
Trees & landscaping

Proposal

TPO - T1 (Sycamore - dead) - Fell. T2 (Ash) - Fell. (summary) Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
11 Sept 2026
✓
Approved
13 Oct 2026

Approved on 13 Oct 2026 · Last checked 10 Oct 2026

Documents

View the documents on the council's website ↗

Site constraints 11

Grade II listed: Claybury Hall (Former Claybury Hospital)
List entry 1081005 · 24 m away · 1 more listed building within 150 m (1 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other one with distances
Historic England ↗
Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Claybury conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Local nature reserve 43 m away: Claybury Park
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Archaeological priority area
An assessment or field evaluation may be asked for before ground works.
The council or Historic England considers archaeology likely here. A desk-based assessment, and sometimes trial trenching, can be asked for with the application.
Air quality management area: Redbridge AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Habitat network: Other Priority Habitats - NEZ
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Inside the Redbridge built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 0 (very poor), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square; Priority habitat 9 m away: Deciduous woodland; Open access land 21 m away: Access Land - Combined Open Country, Registered Common Land and Section 16 Dedicated Land. MoD Byelaw, Section 28 Exclusions, Racecourses and Aerodromes and ECP Margin have been removed..
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redbridge - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Nearby new applications

12 Oct 2026Pending

Development At 11 To 12 And Findlay House 7, Manor Road, Woodford Green

Discharge of conditions for approved permission 2882/23: Facing Materials (Condi...

2882/23/07
9 Oct 2026Pending

18, Manor Road, Chigwell, IG7 5PD

Decking and screen.

EPF/1700/26
2 Oct 2026Approved

30, Rosebury Square, Woodford Green, IG8 8GT

18/09 T5 (London Plane)- Crown reduction by 2.0-2.5m. Lift to 3.5m (summary)

2594/26
2 Oct 2026Pending

1, Roding Lane North, Woodford Green, IG8 8NR

Loft conversion with a rear dormer. Hip to gable roof alterations. Three front r...

2591/26
21 Sept 2026Pending

14, Regents Drive, Woodford Green, IG8 8RZ

Non material amendment to approved permission 3371/25:Approved drawings 14.RD.B0...

3371/25/01
28 Aug 2026Approved

9, North Lodge, Manor Road, Woodford Green, IG8 8GG

TPO 01/96 - T1 (Yew) - Reduce in height by approximately 1m. T2 (Pine) - Reduc

2120/26

Important details

Council
Redbridge
Application type
Works to TPO Tree(s)
Received
11 Sept 2026
Validated
11 Sept 2026
Ward
Bridge
Case officer
Show
Target decision
5 Nov 2026
Decision date
13 Oct 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Becker Tree Contracts Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 32 days from validation, 9 days slower than Redbridge's median of 23 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 89% of tree and landscaping works here are.

100%decided within 8 weeks
89%approved
345decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Redbridge in the last twelve months, from validation. Redbridge decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15208347
Comments by
1 Oct 2026
Site or press notice
11 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry
6 Oct 2026
Redbridge
Planning Authority Score
4.5/10
Below average
#174 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Redbridge ranks #129 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Redbridge is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Redbridge decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
72%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #292 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #267 of 296
69%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #129 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #90 of 296
57%
Minor dwellings approved
152 decided (1-9 homes)
83%
Major dwellings approved
12 decided (10+ homes)
32%
Change of use approved
192 decided
1,673
Total decisions
461 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings