104 flats and flexible space at Former White Horse Ph, Chadwell Heath
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Barking And Dagenham Planning Committee on 16 Dec 2025.
What was proposed
The application would replace the approved public house with flexible commercial or community space while retaining 104 homes and making related layout changes.
“Variation of conditions 1 (time limit), 2 (approved plans), 3 (accessible housing), 4 (external materials), 5 (vents, pipes or extracts), 7 (tree protection measures), 8 (soft and hard landscaping), 9 (urban greening factor), 10 (biodiversity net gain), 11 (children’s play space implementation), 12 (refuse and recycling), 13 (energy strategy), 14 (surface water drainage), 15 (fire strategy), 16 (air quality assessment), 18 (public house – hours of use), 19 (public house -…”
“Informative (not part of the development description): The varied proposal is for demolition of the existing buildings, and the construction of 104 new residential dwellings (C3 Use Class) together with flexible commercial / community space (Class E / F1 / F2) at the ground floor, public realm enhancements including hard and soft landscaping and associated access, servicing, cycle parking, and refuse and recycling stores.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The vacant corner site contained a fire-damaged former public house, with homes, a church, shops, a supermarket and a tall building nearby.
“The application site occupies a prominent position on the corner of the High Road and St Chad’s Road in Chadwell Heath. The site measures 0.31ha in size and it accommodated the former locally listed Former White Horse Public House.”
“The site has been vacant since early 2017 and the building was subject to two fires which badly damaged the structural integrity of the public house building.”
Officer report
Earlier permission and marketing
Earlier permission allowed 104 homes and a replacement public house, but more than two years of marketing produced no public house offers.
“Planning Permission (ref: 22/01757/FULL) was granted in 2024 for redevelopment of the Site, including the demolition of the existing derelict former public house. This consent was for 104 new dwellings included re-provision of a replacement public house. Planning history is set out in greater detail at Appendix 2.”
“However, the public house would not be re-provided as part of the proposal. Instead, two units for flexible commercial/community floorspace (Class E/F1/F2) would be provided on the ground floor. The applicant has set out that they have marketed the public houses for over two years and that they have had no interest from a public house operator in running the site.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the public house requirement was unviable, the site had remained vacant, and the benefits of 104 homes outweighed its loss.
“The proposed amendment would result in the loss of public house floorspace re-provision. The previous application concluded that the former White Horse public house was of heritage value, given its local listing. Officers acknowledge that the building was largely destroyed by fire. However, in applying the policies for the protection of the public house, its value as a heritage asset was acknowledged.”
Officer report
Committee questions
Members asked about future occupants, affordable housing, alternative housing use, retaining a licensed venue, external materials, worship uses and ongoing maintenance.
“The Chair mentioned that the affordable element had been discussed and agreed as part of the previous consent whilst this application was focused on the loss of the public house and associated changes only. That said the PDMO stated that the viability of the scheme had been independently reassessed as part of the application but it still showed a significant deficit to the extent that the applicant could not increase the affordable housing offer on the site.”
“One of the conditions talked about the use of external materials. Not for this application in particular but it would be useful for details of external materials to be presented as part of future applications.”
Minutes
Legal agreement and conditions
Permission was to be granted through an updated agreement, with refusal or an extension delegated if it was not completed by 16 June 2026.
“Delegate authority to the Strategic Director of Inclusive Growth in consultation with the Head of Legal Services to grant planning permission based on the proposed updates to the legal agreement under s106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) set out in the updated Heads of Terms identified at Appendix 5 and the Conditions listed in Appendix 6 of this report, and…”
“That, if by 16 June 2026 the legal agreement has not been completed, the Strategic Director of Inclusive Growth is delegated authority to refuse planning permission or extend this timeframe to grant approval.”
Officer report
Sources
- Barking And Dagenham Planning Committee minutes, 16 December 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Barking And Dagenham's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Barking And Dagenham
- Date
- Tuesday 16 December 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Barking And Dagenham committee decisions →
This committee's year
5 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.