Pantiles Station Hill Ascot SL5 9EG Data via plota.co.uk

26/00975/FULL - Full Awaiting decision

Proposal

Redevelopment of the site to provide 44 dwellings with associated parking, access and landscaping, following demolition of existing buildings. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
21 Apr 2026
✓
Validated
30 Apr 2026
Decision
Expected by 10 Sept 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision soon after comments close on 6 Oct 2026; it is now day 163.

The consultation period closed on 6 Oct 2026.

Documents 106

Statements & assessments 30

PDF Condition sheet: grassland habitat type (low distinctiveness) Supporting Information - Ecology · 26 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Condition sheet: individual trees habitat type Supporting Information - Ecology · 26 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Habitat condition assessment methodology Supporting Information - Ecology · 26 Jun 2026 View ↗ IMG Pantile bng baseline habitats Supporting Information - Ecology · 26 Jun 2026 View ↗ IMG Pantile bng proposed habitats.jpg Supporting Information - Ecology · 26 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Station inn statutory_biodiversity_metric v3 12_06_2026.xlsm Supporting Information - Ecology · 26 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Sustainability Consultee - Comments · 1 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Ecology comment Consultee - Comments · 29 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Statutory_biodiversity_metric v2 30_03_2026.xlsm Supporting Information - General · 30 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Planning and affordable housing statement.pdf Planning Statement · 30 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Drainage strategy report SUDS & drainage · 30 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Crime prevention statement Supporting Information - General · 30 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Arboricultural impact assessment Supporting Information - Arboricultural report · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Air quality assessment Supporting Information - General · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Planning statement Planning Statement · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Framework travel plan Supporting Information - Transport · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Heritage assessment Heritage Statement · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Sustainability and energy statement Supporting Information - General · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Transport statement Supporting Information - Transport · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Arboricultural impact assessment & tree survey Supporting Information - Arboricultural report · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF 5a modified grassland - poor bng assessment input Supporting Information - General · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF 9b individual trees bng assessment input Supporting Information - Tree survey · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Biodiversity enhancement plan Supporting Information - Ecology · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Bat survey report Supporting Information - Ecology · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Preliminary ecological appraisal report Supporting Information - Ecology · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Habitat regulations assessment Supporting Information - Ecology · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Part 1 Design & access statement Design and Access Statement · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Part 2 Design & access statement Design and Access Statement · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Part 3 Design & access statement Design and Access Statement · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Part 4 Design & access statement Design and Access Statement · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗

Plans & drawings 2

PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Community Comments Object · 17 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Car park management plan Supporting Information - General · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗

Consultation & comments 56

PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 2 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Objection email Community Comments Object · 2 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 2 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF Objection email Community Comments Object · 30 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF On behalf of thames valley police Consultee - Comments · 30 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 30 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Objection email Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Objection email Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Objection email Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Objection email Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Objection email Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Objection email Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Objection email Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Objection email Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Objects(full) Community Comments Object · 29 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Network rail Consultee - Comments · 12 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Objects(full) Community Comments Object · 11 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Community Comments Object · 10 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 9 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Sunninghill parish council comments Parish Council Comments · 9 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Appendix a executive summary Parish Council Comments · 9 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 3 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Planning application recommendations from sunninghill and ascot parish council Parish Council Comments · 2 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Community Comments Object Community Comments Object · 29 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Berkshire archaeology.email Consultee - Comments · 28 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Objection email Community Comments Object · 26 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Objection email Community Comments Object · 26 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Objection email Community Comments Object · 26 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Society for the protection of ascot and environs (spae)-objects Consultee - Comments · 26 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Objects(full) Community Comments Object · 26 May 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 26 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Objects(full) Community Comments Object · 21 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Objects(full) Community Comments Object · 20 May 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 20 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Housing comments Consultee - Comments · 19 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Objects(full) Community Comments Object · 19 May 2026 View ↗ PDF 1 public comment Community Comments Object · 18 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Llfa comment Consultee - Comments · 14 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Nature space Consultee - Comments · 14 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Thames water- email Consultee - Comments · 14 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Environmental protection comment Consultee - Comments · 12 May 2026 View ↗ PDF Neighbour notification list Neighbour Notification List · 30 Apr 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 5

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Public footpath 12 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Inside the Ascot and Sunningdale built-up area; Priority habitat 13 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Windsor and Maidenhead - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full
Postcode
SL5 9EG
Received
21 Apr 2026
Validated
30 Apr 2026
Ward
Ascot & Sunninghill
Parish
Sunninghill And Ascot Parish
Case officer
Show
Target decision
10 Sept 2026
Applicant
Show

Decision outlook

Day 163, past the statutory target. 91% of demolitions in Windsor and Maidenhead are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 8 Oct 2026.

Day 16372 days past the 91-day target
77%decided within 8 weeks
74%approved
194decided in the last year

Plota live figures for demolitions decided by Windsor and Maidenhead in the last twelve months, from validation. Windsor and Maidenhead decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14845894
Planning Portal ref
PP-14845894
Comments by
6 Oct 2026
Statutory expiry
30 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
Windsor and Maidenhead
Planning Authority Score
5.3/10
Average
#135 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Windsor and Maidenhead is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #82 out of 296. Only 28% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Windsor and Maidenhead is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 74% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 74% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Windsor and Maidenhead decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
72%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #293 of 296
74%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #294 of 296
75%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #82 of 296
28%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #47 of 296
44%
Minor dwellings approved
156 decided (1-9 homes)
96%
Major dwellings approved
27 decided (10+ homes)
64%
Change of use approved
25 decided
1,530
Total decisions
434 refused in the year to March 2026

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use