Land To The West Of Brunton Lane, North Of Brunton Bridge And East Of Sunniside,, Newcastle Upon Tyne , NE13 8DH Data via plota.co.uk

2019/0666/10/DCC - Approval of Details Reserved by Condition Pending Consideration

Proposal

Submission of Bat Method Statement to comply with condition 6 and Construction Method statement to comply with condition 27 of planning permission dated 13.06.2024. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
12 Jun 2026
Decision
Expected by 7 Aug 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 7 Aug 2026.

Associated applications 4

Site constraints 5

Green belt: Tyne and Wear
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Coal mining development high risk area
Recorded coal mining features at or near the surface. Most planning applications here need a coal mining risk assessment.
From the Mining Remediation Authority, formerly the Coal Authority. The development high risk area marks recorded coal mining features at or near the surface: mine shafts and adits, shallow workings, mine gas and former opencast sites. Most planning applications there need a coal mining risk assessment; householder applications, changes of use and some minor works are exempt. Mine entry positions come from old plans and can be out by several metres, and unrecorded workings can exist anywhere in the coalfield.
Coal mining risk assessments ↗
Tree preservation order: Woolsington Park
Consent is needed before work on protected trees.
Not every council has published its orders as open data, so no order shown is not proof there is none.
Also on the record
Registered park or garden about 172 m away: Woolsington Park; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Newcastle upon Tyne - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Postcode
NE13 8DH
Received
12 Jun 2026
Validated
12 Jun 2026
Ward
Kingston Park and Dinnington
Parish
Woolsington
Case officer
Show
Target decision
7 Aug 2026
Decision level
Delegated decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Lichfields

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
7 Aug 2026
Newcastle upon Tyne
Planning Authority Score
4.9/10
Below average
#154 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Newcastle upon Tyne is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #205 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Newcastle upon Tyne decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
90%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #113 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #86 of 296
56%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #205 of 296
42%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #165 of 296
84%
Minor dwellings approved
37 decided (1-9 homes)
95%
Major dwellings approved
22 decided (10+ homes)
71%
Change of use approved
70 decided
1,005
Total decisions
103 refused in the year to March 2026