Land Off Greenways Flordon Norfolk Data via plota.co.uk

Proposal

Retention of change of use from agricultural land to car sales use, erection of close board fencing, and office unit Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
20 Feb 2026
✓
Validated
1 Apr 2026
✓
Consultation
24 Apr 2026
✗
Refused
25 Sept 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 25 Sept 2026 · Development Management Committee · Last checked 26 Sept 2026

Planning committee

Decided by South Norfolk Broadland South Norfolk Development Management (Planning) Committee on 23 Sept 2026.

Refused unanimously

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised refusal because the countryside location, highway network, drainage and pollution safeguards were unacceptable.
  • The parish council welcomed improvements, while consultees and residents raised concerns about access, traffic, servicing, drainage and the rural setting.
  • Members unanimously refused the application and authorised enforcement action, citing countryside location, transport, character, highway safety, drainage and pollution concerns.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, objections, committee decision and reasons for refusal.

Source: Plota analysis of South Norfolk Broadland's committee minutes of 23 Sept 2026.

Documents 18

Consultation & comments 8

PDF Environmental quality Consultee Comment (D) · 17 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Highway officer comment Consultee Comment (D) · 16 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF Flordon parish council Consultee Comment (D) · 20 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 16 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 14 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 13 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 12 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment (D) · 5 May 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Yare Broads and Marshes
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
National infrastructure project about 1141 m away: Norwich to Tilbury.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in South Norfolk Broadland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full
Received
20 Feb 2026
Validated
1 Apr 2026
Ward
Mulbarton And Stoke Holy Cross
Parish
Flordon
Case officer
Show
Target decision
25 Sept 2026
Decision
Refusal
Decision date
25 Sept 2026
Decision level
Development Management Committee
Applicant
Show
Agent
Howe and Boosey Architectural Services ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 177 days from validation, 94 days slower than South Norfolk Broadland's median of 83 for changes of use. Refused, as 18% of changes of use here are.

25%decided within 8 weeks
82%approved
104decided in the last year

Plota live figures for changes of use decided by South Norfolk Broadland in the last twelve months, from validation. South Norfolk Broadland decision record →

Public comments

5comments received
5 objecting

100% object · above the UK average of 74%

8 neighbours consulted · Last counted 26 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14721796
Planning Portal ref
PP-14721796
Neighbours
24 Apr 2026
Consultation
24 Apr 2026
Comments by
30 Jun 2026
Site or press notice
22 May 2026
Committee
23 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry
27 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
South Norfolk Broadland
Planning Authority Score
5.9/10
Average
#106 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

South Norfolk Broadland ranks #136 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
South Norfolk Broadland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #50 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #71 of 296
67%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #136 of 296
42%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #161 of 296
82%
Minor dwellings approved
137 decided (1-9 homes)
92%
Major dwellings approved
12 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
33 decided
1,013
Total decisions
67 refused in the year to March 2026