Nesfield Hall Nesfield Village Nesfield North Yorkshire LS29 0BN Data via plota.co.uk

26/02130/TCON - Tree works in Conservation Areas Approved

Proposal

Fell 1 No Elm (T1) In Nestfield with Langbar conservation area. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
28 Apr 2026
✓
Consultation
12 May 2026
✓
Approved
27 May 2026

Approved on 27 May 2026 · Officer · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Site constraints 9

3 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: Stocks Approximately 50 Metres South of Manor House, Grade II, about 27 m from the postcode pin · 3 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 3 with distances
Historic England ↗
Green belt: South and West Yorkshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Nidderdale National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Nesfield conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Public footpath about 18 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Agricultural land, grade 4
Poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Open access land about 18 m away: Access Land - Combined Open Country, Registered Common Land and Section 16 Dedicated Land. MoD Byelaw, Section 28 Exclusions, Racecourses and Aerodromes and ECP Margin have been removed..
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Harrogate - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Harrogate
Application type
Tree works in Conservation Areas
Postcode
LS29 0BN
Received
28 Apr 2026
Validated
28 Apr 2026
Ward
Washburn & Birstwith
Parish
Nesfield with Langbar
Case officer
Show
Target decision
9 Jun 2026
Decision
Tree Work in Conservation Area approved
Decision date
27 May 2026
Decision level
Officer
Applicant
Show
Agent
Carpinosa landscapes

How this decision compares

Decided in 29 days from validation, 4 days faster than Harrogate's median of 33 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 88% of tree and landscaping works here are.

92%decided within 8 weeks
88%approved
408decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Harrogate in the last twelve months, from validation. Harrogate decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14891962
Planning Portal ref
PP-14891962
Consultation
12 May 2026
Comments by
5 Jun 2026
Statutory expiry
9 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No