Rose And Crown Public House 48 High Street Feckenham Worcestershire B96 6HS Data via plota.co.uk

26/00491/LBC - Listed Building Consent Approved

Proposal

Replace two original doors with fire resistant copies and replace two modern kitchen doors with fire resistant doors, as required by HW Fire Department. Original doors to be retained on site Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
24 Apr 2026
✓
Validated
30 Apr 2026
✓
Consultation
5 May 2026
✓
Approved
4 Jun 2026

Approved on 4 Jun 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Documents 27

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 9

23 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: 39, High Street, Grade II, about 22 m from the postcode pin · 23 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 23 with distances
Historic England ↗
Green belt: Birmingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Scheduled monument about 127 m away: Feckenham manorial moated site
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Nationally important archaeology protected by the Secretary of State. Work that affects the monument or its setting is rarely permitted.
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 4; National infrastructure project about 548 m away: Arrow Valley Solar, at pre-application; Inside the Feckenham built-up area; Priority habitat about 30 m away: Deciduous woodland; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redditch - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Redditch
Application type
Listed Building Consent
Postcode
B96 6HS
Received
24 Apr 2026
Validated
30 Apr 2026
Ward
Astwood Bank And Feckenham Ward
Parish
Feckenham Parish
Case officer
Show
Target decision
25 Jun 2026
Decision
Listed Building Consent Granted
Decision date
4 Jun 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 35 days from validation, 14 days faster than Redditch's median of 49 for extensions. Approved, as 99% of extensions here are.

73%decided within 8 weeks
99%approved
103decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Redditch in the last twelve months, from validation. Redditch decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14878447
Planning Portal ref
PP-14878447
Consultation
5 May 2026
Comments by
1 Jun 2026
Site or press notice
5 May 2026
Statutory expiry
25 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
Redditch
Planning Authority Score
8.7/10
Excellent
#12 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Redditch is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #69 out of 296. Only 24% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 98% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
98% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Redditch decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
95%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #25 of 296
98%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #22 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #69 of 296
24%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #27 of 296
90%
Minor dwellings approved
10 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
6 decided (10+ homes)
75%
Change of use approved
4 decided
160
Total decisions
8 refused in the year to March 2026