Beech Tree Farm East Green Kelsale Cum Carlton Saxmundham Suffolk IP17 2PH Data via plota.co.uk

DC/26/1385/FUL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Replacement windows and doors in oldest part of building. Replacement window and door in contemporary extension. Installation of roof light in extension. Internal alterations in extension Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
14 Apr 2026
✓
Committee
11 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
12 Aug 2026

Approved on 12 Aug 2026 · Committee Decision · Last checked 13 Aug 2026

Planning committee

Decided by East Suffolk Planning Committee North on 11 Aug 2026.

Approved

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the works would preserve the listed building’s significance.
  • The parish council, ward member and statutory consultees raised no objections.
  • The committee approved the application subject to conditions.
Read how the committee decided The proposed works, site, officer advice, consultation responses, committee discussion, vote and decision. Includes the meeting recording

Source: Plota analysis of East Suffolk's committee minutes of 11 Aug 2026.

Documents 22

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 3

Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
1 listed building within 150 m.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in East Suffolk - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Application
Postcode
IP17 2PH
Received
14 Apr 2026
Validated
14 Apr 2026
Ward
Kelsale And Yoxford
Parish
Kelsale Cum Carlton
Case officer
Show
Target decision
9 Jun 2026
Decision
Application Permitted
Decision date
12 Aug 2026
Decision level
Committee Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Robert Allerton Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 120 days from validation, 64 days slower than East Suffolk's median of 56 for extensions. Approved, as 96% of extensions here are.

61%decided within 8 weeks
96%approved
669decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by East Suffolk in the last twelve months, from validation. East Suffolk decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

4 neighbours consulted · Last counted 13 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Committee
11 Aug 2026
Env. assessment
No
East Suffolk
Planning Authority Score
5.3/10
Average
#129 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

East Suffolk ranks #183 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
East Suffolk decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #81 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #76 of 296
60%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #183 of 296
42%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #162 of 296
80%
Minor dwellings approved
212 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
19 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
139 decided
1,965
Total decisions
158 refused in the year to March 2026