The White House Robinettes Lane Cossall Nottinghamshire NG16 2RX Data via plota.co.uk

26/00259/CAT - Works to Trees in a Conservation Area Approved

Proposal

T1 - Lawson Cypress - reduction by 2-3m in height T2 - Crimson King - reduction to previous points Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
16 Apr 2026
✓
Validated
17 Apr 2026
✓
Consultation
17 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
28 May 2026

Approved on 28 May 2026 · Director of Planning and Development · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Site constraints 7

Green belt: Derby and Nottingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Coal mining development high risk area
Recorded coal mining features at or near the surface. Most planning applications here need a coal mining risk assessment.
From the Mining Remediation Authority, formerly the Coal Authority. The development high risk area marks recorded coal mining features at or near the surface: mine shafts and adits, shallow workings, mine gas and former opencast sites. Most planning applications there need a coal mining risk assessment; householder applications, changes of use and some minor works are exempt. Mine entry positions come from old plans and can be out by several metres, and unrecorded workings can exist anywhere in the coalfield.
Coal mining risk assessments ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; SSSI about 320 m away: Robbinetts SSSI; Local nature reserve about 411 m away: Nottingham Canal.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Broxtowe - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Broxtowe
Application type
Works to Trees in a Conservation Area
Postcode
NG16 2RX
Received
16 Apr 2026
Validated
17 Apr 2026
Ward
Awsworth, Cossall & Trowell
Parish
Cossall Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
29 May 2026
Decision
No Objection
Decision date
28 May 2026
Decision level
Director of Planning and Development
Applicant
Show
Agent
Arbor Tree Services

How this decision compares

Decided in 41 days from validation, 6 days slower than Broxtowe's median of 35 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 97% of tree and landscaping works here are.

99%decided within 8 weeks
97%approved
82decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Broxtowe in the last twelve months, from validation. Broxtowe decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14861788
Planning Portal ref
PP-14861788
Consultation
17 Apr 2026
Comments by
8 May 2026
Statutory expiry
29 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Broxtowe
Planning Authority Score
8.4/10
Excellent
#16 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Broxtowe is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #48 out of 296. Only 29% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Broxtowe decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
94%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #35 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #52 of 296
78%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #48 of 296
29%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #48 of 296
83%
Minor dwellings approved
42 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
7 decided (10+ homes)
92%
Change of use approved
36 decided
479
Total decisions
29 refused in the year to March 2026