The Rectory Back Lane Kettlebaston Ipswich Suffolk IP7 7QA Data via plota.co.uk

DC/26/01565 - Notification Approved

Proposal

Notification of Works to Trees in a Conservation Area - Fell 1 No Pine (T1), reduce height of 2 No. Ash (T2 and T3), Fell 1 No. Tree (T4), Fell 2 No. Ash (T5 and T6), Fell 1 No. Pine (T7) and remove laurel bush (T8) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
13 Apr 2026
Validated
14 Apr 2026
Consultation
14 Apr 2026
Approved
8 May 2026

Approved on 8 May 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Site constraints 2

Kettlebaston conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map, which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Babergh Mid Suffolk - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Notification
Postcode
IP7 7QA
Received
13 Apr 2026
Validated
14 Apr 2026
Ward
North West Cosford
Parish
Kettlebaston
Case officer
Show
Target decision
26 May 2026
Decision
Raise No Objection
Decision date
8 May 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision

How this decision compares

Decided in 24 days from validation, 4 days faster than Babergh Mid Suffolk's median of 28 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 100% of tree and landscaping works here are.

99%decided within 8 weeks
100%approved
288decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Babergh Mid Suffolk in the last twelve months, from validation. Babergh Mid Suffolk decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
14 Apr 2026
Comments by
5 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Babergh Mid Suffolk
Planning Authority Score
7.7/10
Good
#33 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Babergh Mid Suffolk is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #56 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Babergh Mid Suffolk decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #124 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #68 of 296
77%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #56 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #83 of 296
74%
Minor dwellings approved
160 decided (1-9 homes)
73%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
93%
Change of use approved
40 decided
882
Total decisions
99 refused in the year to March 2026