Cleveland Oakhunger Lane Berkeley Gloucestershire GL13 9TJ Data via plota.co.uk

S.26/0136/FUL - Full Planning Application Refused

Proposal

Siting of a mobile home for use as a dwellinghouse (Use Class C3) for an agricultural worker, together with the erection of access gates Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
27 Jan 2026
✓
Validated
31 Mar 2026
✗
Refused
22 May 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 22 May 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Site constraints 4

In flood zones plus climate change
Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From the sea. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.
Flood map ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 3.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Stroud - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Stroud
Application type
Full Planning Application
Postcode
GL13 9TJ
Received
27 Jan 2026
Validated
31 Mar 2026
Ward
Berkeley Vale Ward
Parish
Hamfallow Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
26 May 2026
Decision
Refusal
Decision date
22 May 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
AJW Plans

How this decision compares

Decided in 52 days from validation, about the council's usual 52 days. Refused, as 38% of agricultural works here are.

79%decided within 8 weeks
62%approved
59decided in the last year

Plota live figures for agricultural works decided by Stroud in the last twelve months, from validation. Stroud decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
9 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Stroud
Planning Authority Score
5.4/10
Average
#126 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Stroud ranks #98 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Stroud decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
87%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #181 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #166 of 296
73%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #98 of 296
39%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #144 of 296
63%
Minor dwellings approved
64 decided (1-9 homes)
70%
Major dwellings approved
10 decided (10+ homes)
83%
Change of use approved
54 decided
964
Total decisions
121 refused in the year to March 2026