Barn conversion and replacement building at Elm Tree Farm, Heapham, Gainsborough

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by West Lindsey Planning Committee on 22 Jul 2026.

WL/2026/00311Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed converting and partly rebuilding a barn into one dwelling, removing an agricultural building and constructing a mixed-use replacement.

“PROPOSAL: Planning application for conversion and rebuild of barn to create 1no. dwelling, demolition of existing agricultural building and replacement building for agricultural and domestic use.”

“Site Description: The application site is located in the open countryside, within the wider parish of Heapham. The site currently consists of the remnants of the demolished main farmhouse, a dilapidated timber framed agricultural building, a courtyard shaped barn complex with modern steel framed agricultural canopy within the courtyard, as well as brick dovecote.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended permission with conditions and a legal undertaking securing the barn conversion as serviced custom or self-build housing.

“Recommended Decision: Grant permission subject to conditions and the signing of a Section 106 Legal Agreement (Unilateral Undertaking) to:”

“to secure the barn conversion to residential use as serviced custom/self- build plots.”

Officer report

Why officers supported it

Officers considered that preserving the historic barn and retaining its future use outweighed the harm from the replacement building and departure from countryside policy.

“Concluding Statement: The barn would no longer suitable for modern agricultural use and is considered to be of notable architectural and historic merit. The barn conversion would include works which would go above and beyond what can be considered minimal alteration.”

“The proposed development would be expected to comply with local policy S5 Part A (a)(c) and Part E of the CLLP and the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework. However, the rebuild works cannot be considered as conversion therefore the development would not be fully capable of conversion and would not fully comply with local policy S5 Part A (b) of the CLLP.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Residents, the parish council and several consultees made no objections, highways raised no objection, archaeology sought conditions and ecology requested updated surveys.

“LCC Highways and Lead Local Flood Authority: No objections Having given due regard to the appropriate local and national planning policy guidance (in particular the National Planning Policy Framework), Lincolnshire County Council (as Highway Authority and Lead Local Flood Authority) has concluded that the proposed development would not be expected to have an unacceptable impact upon highway safety or a severe residual cumulative impact upon the local highway network or…”

“Regarding protected species, we require updated Edna for pond 1 and updated emergence surveys for bats as these surveys are no longer in date as per the CIEEM guidance (they fall into the 18 months- 3 years category: https://cieem.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Advice-Note.pdf ), and the expanded site boundary may have the potential to include more evidence of protected species than was previously identified, especially the more mobile species.”

Officer report

What members discussed

Members supported the scheme as a practical way to preserve the building, while recognising that some design elements might not be personally preferred.

“Details of the proposed conversion works, including alterations to the barn, associated extensions, and the proposed replacement building, were shown. Members were advised that the scheme had been subject to pre application discussions and amendments following negotiations with Officers.”

“The Chairman acknowledged that, whilst some elements of the design would not necessarily reflect his personal preference, he recognised the wider benefits of the scheme and the investment proposed in securing the future of the heritage asset.”

Minutes

The committee vote

The committee voted on and accepted the officer recommendation.

“With no further comments, the proposal to accept the Officer’s recommendations was duly seconded and voted upon. It was therefore agreed that planning permission be GRANTED subject to the following conditions:”

Minutes

The final decision

Planning permission was granted subject to conditions covering heritage recording, ecology, archaeology, drainage, materials, contamination and permitted development rights.

“Notwithstanding the provisions of Classes A, AA, B, C, D, E, F, G and H of Schedule 2 Part 1 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (or any order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification) the dwellings, annex and carport building hereby permitted must not be extended, altered and no buildings or structures shall be erected within the curtilage of the dwellings, annex and carport building unless…”

“Notwithstanding the provisions of Class A of Schedule 2 Part 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (or any order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification) the dwellings, annex and car port building hereby permitted no gates, fences, walls or other means of enclosure must be erected within or on the boundary of the site unless planning permission has first been granted by the Local Planning…”

Minutes

Conditions

Approved subject to 4 conditions, set out in the minutes.

Sources

  • West Lindsey Planning Committee minutes, 22 July 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of West Lindsey's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Wednesday 22 July 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

12 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →