Land Between Runnels Hey And Silverthorn Great Canfield Road Great Canfield Essex Data via plota.co.uk

UTT/26/0764/DFO - Details Following Outline Approved

Proposal

Details following outline application for the erection of 1 no. self-build dwellinghouse - details of access, appearance, landscaping, layout and scale. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
27 Mar 2026
✓
Validated
7 Apr 2026
✓
Consultation
19 Jun 2026
✓
Approved
13 Jul 2026

Approved on 13 Jul 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 14 Jul 2026

Documents 49

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    Outlinecouncil archive
    • OutlineDetails for the erection of 1 no. self-build dwellinghouse - details of access, appearance…This applicationUTT/26/0764/DFO

Site constraints 5

Local nature reserve 55 m away: Flitch Way
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Ancient woodland 12 m away: Runnels Hay
Inside the 15 m buffer standing advice asks for from the boundary.
National policy refuses development that would cause loss or deterioration of ancient woodland or ancient trees unless there are wholly exceptional reasons.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Priority habitat 14 m away: Deciduous woodland; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 2, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Uttlesford - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Uttlesford
Application type
Details Following Outline
Postcode
CM22 6ST
Received
27 Mar 2026
Validated
7 Apr 2026
Ward
Broad Oak And The Hallingburys
Parish
Great Canfield
Case officer
Show
Target decision
2 Jun 2026
Decision
Approve with Conditions
Decision date
13 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
designFuse

How this decision compares

Decided in 97 days from validation, 42 days slower than Uttlesford's median of 55 for new homes. Approved, as 54% of new homes here are.

60%decided within 8 weeks
54%approved
8%go to committee

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Uttlesford in the last twelve months, from validation. Uttlesford decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Neighbours
13 Jul 2026
Consultation
19 Jun 2026
Comments by
3 Jul 2026
Statutory expiry
2 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
Uttlesford
Planning Authority Score
6.2/10
Average
#95 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Uttlesford is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #31 out of 296. Only 25% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Uttlesford is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Uttlesford decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
77%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #280 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #272 of 296
82%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #31 of 296
25%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #33 of 296
71%
Minor dwellings approved
276 decided (1-9 homes)
87%
Major dwellings approved
23 decided (10+ homes)
64%
Change of use approved
28 decided
1,247
Total decisions
288 refused in the year to March 2026