Land at White Stork Road, Adjacent to the Roundabout with Winchester Road Data via plota.co.uk

A/26/102007 - Advertisement Valid

Proposal

Display of 12 no. signs consisting of 2 no. sets of illuminated wall mounted individual lettering to vehicular entrance; 2 no. sets of illuminated wall mounted individual lettering to pedestrian entrance; 2 no. sets of illuminated entrance canopy mounted individual lettering; 2 no. non-illuminated high-level wall mounted signs; 1 no. low level non-illuminated totem sign; 1 no. non-illuminated railing mounted sign; 1 no. illuminated wall mounted entrance light box sign; and 1 no. illuminated, double sided tall totem sign… Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
27 Aug 2026
Decision
Expected by 22 Oct 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision around 17 Nov 2026, from Eastleigh's recent advertisement consent.

Site constraints 3

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Solent: Includes Chichester and Langstone Harbours SPA/Ramsar, Solent and Southampton Water SPA/Ramsar, Solent Maritime SAC, Portsmouth Harbour SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Agricultural land, grade 3b, surveyed
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). From a field survey (Reading). The older provisional map agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Survey report ↗
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Eastleigh - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Eastleigh
Application type
Advertisement
Received
27 Aug 2026
Validated
27 Aug 2026
Agent
Lucy Lloyd

Decision outlook

Day 18 of the 56-day target. Eastleigh usually decides advertisement consent by day 82.

Day 1864 days to the predicted decision (day 82)
15%decided within 8 weeks
100%approved
13decided in the last year

Plota live figures for advertisement consent decided by Eastleigh in the last twelve months, from validation. Eastleigh decision record →

Eastleigh
Planning Authority Score
6.8/10
Good
#67 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Eastleigh is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #94 out of 296. Only 27% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Eastleigh decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
90%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #111 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #153 of 296
73%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #94 of 296
27%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #40 of 296
63%
Minor dwellings approved
30 decided (1-9 homes)
67%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
91%
Change of use approved
11 decided
547
Total decisions
55 refused in the year to March 2026