2 Bridge Cottages, Shamblehurst Lane North, Botley, Southampton, SO32 2BY Data via plota.co.uk

EA/26/101744 - Enforcement Appeal Valid

Proposal

Without planning permission, the material change of use of land as a HGV and storage yard with ancillary fencing, storage containers, CCTV, gas tanks, scaffolding and hardstanding at the Land at 2 Bridge Cottages, Shamblehurst Lane North, Hedge End, SO32 2BY. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
10 Jul 2026
Decision
Expected by 4 Sept 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision soon after comments close on 17 Sept 2026; it is now day 66. Comments are open until 17 Sept 2026.

Comment on this application ↗

Site constraints 3

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Solent: Includes Chichester and Langstone Harbours SPA/Ramsar, Solent and Southampton Water SPA/Ramsar, Solent Maritime SAC, Portsmouth Harbour SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Eastleigh - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Eastleigh
Application type
Enforcement Appeal
Postcode
SO32 2BY
Received
10 Jul 2026
Validated
10 Jul 2026
Ward
Botley Ward
Parish
Botley CP
Decision level
Delegated Decision

Decision outlook

Day 66, past the statutory target. 91% of other in Eastleigh are decided within thirteen weeks, which runs to 9 Oct 2026; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 12 Sept 2026.

Day 664 days to the predicted decision (day 70)
81%decided within 8 weeks
91%approved
2,213decided in the last year

Plota live figures for other decided across the UK in the last twelve months, from validation; too few recent other in Eastleigh to go on. Eastleigh decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
17 Sept 2026
Eastleigh
Planning Authority Score
6.8/10
Good
#67 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Eastleigh is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #94 out of 296. Only 27% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Eastleigh decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
90%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #111 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #153 of 296
73%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #94 of 296
27%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #40 of 296
63%
Minor dwellings approved
30 decided (1-9 homes)
67%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
91%
Change of use approved
11 decided
547
Total decisions
55 refused in the year to March 2026