Christmas farm and recreation centre at Christmas Farm, Cefn-y-bedd, Wrexham
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Wrexham Planning Committee on 24 Apr 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed a Christmas tree farm and outdoor recreation centre with reindeer facilities, water activities, a building, parking, access and landscaping.
“Description of Development NEWID DEFNYDD TIR AR GYFER EI DDEFNYDDIO FEL FFERM GOED NADOLIG A CHANOLFAN HAMDDEN AWYR AGORED I GYNNWYS CANOLFAN CEIRW, PADLFYRDDIO, GWEITHGAREDDAU DWR AC YMESTYN Y LLYN PRESENNOL, CREU LLWYBR RHISGL, CODI ADEILAD I DDARPARU SWYDDFA, STORFA PEIRIANNAU AC OFFER, STORFA WELLT A GOFOD BAE SALWCH/MAMOLAETH AR GYFER CEIRW A CHREU MAES PARCIO, MYNEDIAD A THIRLUNIO SAFLE / CHANGE OF USE OF LAND FOR USE AS CHRISTMAS TREE FARM AND OUTDOOR RECREATION…”
“Proposal The application seeks consent for the change of use of land to a mixed use including a Christmas tree farm and outdoor recreation including the provision of a reindeer centre, paddle boarding, water related activities, engineering operations to extend the existing lake, creation of bark footpath, erection of a cedar clad agricultural building to provide office, machinery and equipment store, hay/straw storage, a sick bay and maternity bay for reindeer, the creation…”
Officer report
The site and its setting
The site comprises about 16.6 hectares of agricultural land south of Llay Road and east of Park Road.
“Site Description The application site comprises approximately 16.6ha of agricultural land located to the south of the B5102 public highway (Llay Road) and to the east of Park Road.”
Officer report
Earlier application and appeal
An earlier application for similar development was refused and its appeal was dismissed; the resubmission addressed drainage and pedestrian safety issues.
“Site History P/2022/0681 - use of the site as a Christmas tree farm and outdoor recreation centre to include a ‘reindeer centre’, paddle boarding and water related activities. The application also proposed the erection of a building to provide an office, machine and equipment store, a hay/straw storage area and a sick/maternity bay for reindeer. Refused 06/11/2023 Appeal dismissed 03/12/2024.”
Officer report
Officers recommended approval
Officers considered the principle acceptable and concluded that, with conditions, the development would not cause visual, residential, highway or ecological harm.
“Given that there a no material differences between the proposed development and the scheme considered by the appeal Inspector in respect of natural environment considerations and that there have been no material changes in circumstances since the appeal decision, subject to suitably worded planning conditions, the proposed development would not give rise to ecological concerns in respect of protected species and protected sites or concerns regarding trees or hedgerows .”
“Conclusion The proposed development would not give rise to visual impact, residential amenity, highway safety or ecological concerns. It therefore accords with the relevant UDP policies, PPW and relevant Technical Advice Notes.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Several consultees raised no objection subject to conditions, while Cycle UK requested cycle parking and safer connections to the shared footway and cycleway.
“Cycle UK: Recommends that planning conditions requiring the installation of cycle parking, compliant with Welsh Government’s Active Travel Guidance and Wrexham’s own Local Planning Guidance. In addition, recommend improvements to the design of the junction to provide safe access from the carriageway to the Shared Foot/Cycleway in line with the Active Travel Act Guidance should be made.”
“Highway Officer: Raises no objection subject to planning conditions requiring the submission of a Construction Traffic Management Plan, Service Delivery Management Plan and a Car Parking Management Plan. A planning condition relating to opening hours is also recommended in the interests of pedestrian safety.”
Officer report
Local concerns
One local member raised concerns about timing, policy, stagnant water, highway and pedestrian safety, drainage and biodiversity; another supported the application subject to mitigation.
“Local Members: Cllr Apsley Concerned that this application is coming before the Planning Committee within four months of it being refused at appeal. Concerned as there is no specific policy in the LDP which covers this kind of development. The stagnant water is highly likely to be a health hazard to people like Paddle Boarders. Concerned with highway and pedestrian safety as described by the inspector's report.”
Officer report
Members debated pedestrian safety
Members discussed speeding, overgrown verges, crossing design, visibility, traffic levels and the site’s popularity, while recognising that improvements were needed.
“Concern that during the site visit, many vehicles were observed travelling above the speed limit. • Concern that by late summer the verges and hedgerows would likely be overgrown, further affecting visibility. • Acknowledgement that although significant highway safety improvements were required, the application presented an opportunity to address these issues.”
“This document is also available in Welsh This Committee’s meetings are webcast and can be viewed by visiting the webcast library at: https://wrexham.public-i.tv/core/portal/webcasts • Officers advised that pedestrian traffic levels were unlikely to be high enough to justify a zebra crossing. • Traffic lights were considered unsuitable in this location due to the need for full visibility for approaching vehicles.”
Minutes
Permission was refused
The committee refused planning permission because the development did not provide a safe means of pedestrian access and conflicted with policy GDP1.
“RESOLVED – That planning permission be refused as the development does not provide a safe means of pedestrian access and therefore conflicts with policy GDP1 of the Wrexham Unitary Development Plan.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
The members' reasons are quoted from the minutes above, under “Permission was refused”.
Sources
- Wrexham Planning Committee minutes, 24 April 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Wrexham's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Wrexham Planning Committee
- Council
- Wrexham
- Date
- Friday 24 April 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Refused, against officer advice
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Wrexham committee decisions →
This committee's year
16 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.