House extensions at 176 Codsall Road, Wolverhampton
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Wolverhampton Planning Committee on 8 Jul 2025.
What was proposed
The application proposed front, rear two-storey and rear single-storey extensions, including a Juliet balcony and kitchen and dining room space.
“Planning application no. 25/00413/FUL Site 176 Codsall Road, Wolverhampton, WV6 9QQ. Proposal Proposed single storey front extension, rear double-storey extension with Juliet balcony, rear single-storey kitchen and dining room extension.”
“Summary recommendation 1.1 Grant with conditions 2.0 Application site 2.1 176 Codsall Road is a large, mid-century detached home with seven bedrooms and substantial front and rear gardens. The property sits on the boundary with open land designated as greenbelt within South Staffordshire 3.0 Application details 3.1 The application proposal is for single storey front extension, rear double storey extension with a Juliet balcony, rear single storey kitchen and dining…”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
An earlier application for a rear extension, first-floor infill extension and car port was granted in May 2021.
“Planning History 4.1 21/00333/FUL – Single storey rear extension, first floor infill extension and car port to front entrance. Granted - 04 May 2021 5.0 Relevant policy documents 5.1 National Planning Policy Framework – (NPPF) Planning Practice Guidance – (PPG) The Development Plan – Wolverhampton Development Plan (UDP) Black Country Core Strategy…”
Officer report
The objection
One objection concerned the rear extension’s scale and mass, possible loss of residential amenity and impact on views of green belt land.
“Publicity 6.1 One objection received concerning the single storey rear extension summarised as follows: • Scale and mass would cause loss of residential amenity • Impact on views of green belt land…”
Officer report
The committee’s discussion
Members were satisfied with the proposals, and noted the importance of the condition requiring materials to match the existing building.
“Laleeta Butoy, Planning Officer outlined the report.”
“Members of the Committee were satisfied with the proposals, and the importance of the condition at paragraph 11.1 of the report regarding matching materials was noted.”
Minutes
The vote
Councillor Paul Sweet moved the report’s recommendations and Councillor Rita Potter seconded them.
“Councillor Paul Sweet moved the recommendations within the report. Councillor Rita Potter seconded the recommendations.”
Minutes
The decision
The committee granted the application subject to matching-materials and Juliet-balcony conditions.
“Resolved: That planning application 25/00413/FUL be granted subject to following conditions: • The external materials used in the development shall match those of the existing building in size, colour, form and texture. • The Juliet balcony shall be installed without any external platform capable of being stood upon for the lifetime of the development hereby permitted.”
Minutes
Sources
- Wolverhampton Planning Committee minutes, 8 July 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Wolverhampton's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Wolverhampton Planning Committee
- Council
- Wolverhampton
- Date
- Tuesday 8 July 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Wolverhampton committee decisions →
This committee's year
11 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.