Creative headquarters extension at 9-15 Elcho Street, London SW11

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Wandsworth Planning Applications Committee on 20 Jan 2026.

2025/0799Approved

The site and surroundings

The site is occupied by a mixed-height commercial building beside residential, educational and other commercial developments in a tall-building zone.

“The Albion Riverside mixed-use development ‘Quarter’ by Foster and Partners lies to the north/northeast of the site with a 5-storey commercial building built as part of that scheme presenting a blank façade to the northern boundary of the application site. To the immediate west of the site at Nos. 12-18 Radstock Street is a gated, residential led scheme, Radstock House that provides 8 residential units over a part-single, part-5, part-6 storey arrangement.”

“Directly across Howie Street to the south is The RCA’s latest addition, the Studio Building. Granted permission in 2018 (Ref. 2017/6064) alongside the adjacent Rausing (Research) Building, these are strikingly contemporary additions by architects Herzog de Meuron to the existing RCA Battersea campus and complement the existing Dyson Building, Woo Building and aforementioned Painting Building all located to the west of the application site and east of Battersea Bridge Road.”

Officer report

Earlier permissions

Earlier permissions allowed extensions, a basement and a separate building on the site, while nearby permissions allowed substantial redevelopment and taller buildings.

“2017: (RCA Studio and Rausing Building): 1-11 & 15-25 Howie Street 1-4 Elcho Street 7-9 & 15-25 Parkgate Road and Southern section of Radstock Street SW11 4AS (Ref: 2017/6064): Granted subject to conditions, S106 and CIL: 07/11/2017: Demolition of existing buildings and redevelopment of site to provide a part 4-storey (23.43m high) and part 8-storey (32.75m high) college building (D1 use class) with ancillary uses including business incubators, academic research and…”

“Although both the above 2015 and 2016 permissions (2015/1203 & 2016/0654) significantly pre-date both the adoption of the current London Plan and the Wandsworth Local Plan they can still be seen as material considerations. The 2015 permission (2015/1203) was, in concept terms, not dissimilar to the current scheme with an overall south to north stepping up of built form.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the proposal supported employment, intensified an appropriate use and fitted the designated tall-building location and surrounding development.

“WLP LP39 (Local Employment and Training Opportunities) requires that all new major development would be required to enter into a Local Employment and Enterprise Agreement, as part of a Section 106 planning obligation and that the this obligation would set out how the proposal would, where appropriate provide jobs, enterprise, training and apprenticeship places for Wandsworth residents, focusing on disadvantaged groups and those under-represented within the workforce by…”

Officer report

Design and neighbour effects

Officers considered the design and townscape benefits acceptable, while finding limited heritage harm and tolerable daylight and sunlight effects for neighbours.

“In terms of visual impacts (which is one of a number of areas of assessment that LP4 refers to) the proposal would feature as part of an established cluster of taller buildings in this location and it can be said to respond to and respect key views and corridors. The issue of key views is looked at later in this report in the consideration of the Heritage and Townscape Visual Impact Assessment and wider heritage impacts.”

“Policy D9 C.3 asks that various environmental impacts are considered including daylight/sunlight penetration, the need not to compromise conditions in any nearby open spaces or bodies of water with Part (c) specifically stating that noise created by air movements around the building(s), servicing machinery, or building uses, should not detract from the comfort and enjoyment of open spaces around the building.”

Officer report

Other views received

The heritage committee supported the proposal, while consultees generally raised no objection subject to conditions, further details or legal obligations.

“Land use: The proposed intensification of office space for research and development on site is supported in terms of land use principles. • Urban design, tall buildings and heritage: The overall design and visual impacts of the proposals are acceptable.”

“TfL – Spatial Planning: No objection subject to conditions/legal agreement: Healthy Streets and Vision Zero The routes selected as part of the nighttime Active Travel Zone (ATZ) assessment are acceptable. Car Parking Disabled bay parking locations have been identified and are acceptable.”

Officer report

Members’ discussion

Members discussed shading, daylight, glass, overheating, flooding, sustainability, the green wall, terrace screening and community benefits.

“A Member referred to the significant use of glass in the scheme and questioned how the rising temperatures that had been found in modern buildings would be mitigated. Page 132 of the agenda pack, from paragraph 8.19 onwards, addressed cooling and overheating, and measures to mitigate the risk of overheating to the buildings.”

“The sustainability of the green wall (vertical meadow) was questioned, and due to this scheme involving one applicant and one occupier there was more opportunity for the green wall to be maintained. The Legal Advisor suggested that condition 51 on…”

Minutes

The vote

The committee voted unanimously to grant planning permission with an amended landscaping condition, an informative and specified legal and referral requirements.

“Official pages 165 and 166 of the agenda pack that covers landscaping, could be amended to include that the landscape scheme includes provisions for the monitoring and maintenance of the vertical meadow and require replanting where needed. The Committee agreed to this amendment to condition 51.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Wandsworth Planning Applications Committee minutes, 20 January 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Wandsworth's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Wandsworth
Date
Tuesday 20 January 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

28 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →