Three detached houses at 92 Larkswood Road, Chingford, London E4

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Waltham Forest Planning Committee on 6 May 2025.

243161Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed demolishing two existing dwellings and building three two-storey detached houses with parking, access, storage and landscaping.

“Committee/Date: Planning – 06 May 2025 Application reference: 243161 Applicant: [the applicant]: Larkswood Road, Chingford, London, E4 9DU Proposed development: Demolition of two existing dwellings and construction of 3 x 2 storey dwelling house together with gated access, boundary fence, car parking with a carport, secure waste and recycling storage and associated landscaping. Wards affected: Larkswood Appendices: None…”

“The proposal is for the demolition of the existing buildings, and construction of three detached houses of three bedroom six person, accessed via the existing site access, which will be gated as part of the new development. The dwellings would be centrally positioned on the site, set away from site boundary, unlike the existing buildings. Each dwelling would benefit from a side/rear garden wrapping around the property.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The backland site is surrounded by residential gardens, heavily vegetated, enclosed by fencing and accessed between two properties on Larkswood Road.

“The site occupies a backland position surrounded by the gardens of properties along Larkswood Road, Bourne Gardens and Ainslie Wood Gardens. The site falls on the southern side of Larkswood Road. It is broadly rectangular in shape and measures circa 1486m2 and is enclosed by areas of close board timber fencing and areas of dense and mature vegetation. The site access is from an existing driveway that runs between No. 90 and No.94 Larkswood Road.”

“Fig 2: Site location plan 3.4. The site is an enclosed site, setting back approximately 30m from the nearest properties and 48m from Larkswood Road. The surrounding area is suburban and residential in character, which mostly comprises semi-detached and terraced dwellings of a mid- twentieth century design. Hipped roofs are a unifying design characteristic although some of these have been extended in to end gables alongside roof extensions. 3.5.”

Officer report

Earlier applications

A previous three-house application was withdrawn, pre-application advice was sought, and there was no enforcement history.

“Planning 5.1. There was a previous application (reference 220740) for a development of three two- storey detached house, which was withdrawn on 04 July 2022. Pre-application 5.2. Pre-application advice reference: PRE_22_0217 was sought for the demolition of two existing dwellings and the construction of 3x3 bedroom detached houses with associated landscaping and parking. This application has subsequently been submitted following the pre-application. Planning Enforcement 5.3.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the proposal would provide well-designed homes, satisfactory accommodation and no adverse impact on neighbours or highway safety, subject to mitigation.

“The principle of the introduction of three 3-bedroom residential units in this location is acceptable. The proposal would provide a well-designed, high quality residential development which would achieve satisfactory standard of accommodation for future occupants and would not have an adverse impact on neighbouring amenity or highway safety.”

“Overall, officers have given careful consideration to the material considerations and where impacts are forecast to arise from the proposed development, adequate mitigation measures have been introduced to make the proposed development acceptable in planning terms. RECOMMENDATION”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Highways raised no concerns, other council officers supported the proposal subject to conditions, and Natural England had no objection subject to mitigation.

“Table 2: summary of internal responses Consultee Comments Highways No highway concerns raised, and the following was requested on grant of any forthcoming approval: - Submission of Full Construction Logistic Plan (CLP, along with financial contribution of £250 towards CLP monitoring.”

“Table 3: summary of external responses Consultee Comments Highams Park Planning Group No response. Thames Water No response. Natural England No objection subject to appropriate mitigation measures. London Fire Brigade No response.”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The committee granted planning permission subject to the report’s conditions and informatives and completion of a Section 106 agreement covering environmental, transport, energy, design and monitoring matters.

“That planning permission be granted for application 243161 in line with the reasons and recommendations contained in the committee report, subject to the conditions and informatives set out in the report, and completion of a Section 106 Legal Agreement (S106) with the following Heads of Terms:”

“Minor Amendments That authority to be given to the Assistant Director - Development Management and Building Control in consultation with the Council’s Legal Services for the sealing of the S106 Agreement and to agree any minor amendments to the conditions or the legal agreement on the terms set out above.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Waltham Forest Planning Committee minutes, 6 May 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Waltham Forest's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Tuesday 6 May 2025
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)