Entrance and parking works at The Darwin Laboratory Building 900 Chesterford Park Little Chesterford Saffron Walden

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Uttlesford Planning Committee on 2 Jul 2025.

UTT/25/0652/FULApproved

The meeting was recorded; the recording is on the council's website.

What was proposed

The application proposed a replacement entrance lobby and canopy, changes to pedestrian access and parking, and external paving alterations.

“The application seeks planning permission for proposed minor works to the existing building entrance, including replacement lobby structure and canopy, revised parking configuration and external paving. The proposed works include:”

“Replacement of the front entrance lobby, with a small footprint increase, and introduction of a canopy. Associated alterations to the pedestrian access, minor reconfiguration of existing car parking spaces. A section of the existing curtain walling to be converted to a door to facilitate access from a communal area internally to the grassed amenity space externally…”

Officer report

The site

The site was a laboratory research facility within Chesterford Research Park, with its own car park, entrance and service access.

“The application site is within Chesterford Research Park. It is known as Building 900 (Darwin Building), and it is a purpose-built laboratory research facility built circa 2005. It is built over ground, first and second floor (plant room) comprising c.33,000 square feet gross internal area. Most recently the building has been solely occupied by AstraZeneca.”

“The Research Park offers high-standard laboratory and office spaces within a serene parkland setting.”

Officer report

Planning history

The site had substantial planning history, but none was considered particularly relevant, and no pre-application discussions took place.

“There is a significant amount of planning history for the site and the surrounding area, however, none of which is particularly relevant to the proposals.”

“No pre-application discussions were undertaken between the Applicant and the Council prior to the submission of the Application.”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended approval because the design was appropriate, neighbouring amenities would not be harmed, and the proposal complied with relevant policies.

“The proposals are appropriate in respect to their design and appearance and would not result in harm to amenities enjoyed by adjoining users or to the significance and setting of the character of the area.”

“The proposals have been assessed against the relevant policies contained within the Development Plan and the NPPF. It has been concluded that they comply and in accordance with these policies and guidance. In conclusion, it has been found that the proposals are acceptable and thus are recommended for approval subject to conditions.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Environmental Health and Highways raised no objections, no parish council comments had been received, and no public representations were submitted.

“No comments were received at the time of the officer’s assessment.”

“The application was notified by displaying a site notice and sending letters to adjoining and adjacent occupiers. No representations have been received at the time of this assessment.”

Officer report

Committee consideration

The Planning Officer presented the proposal, and approval was proposed and seconded by councillors.

“The Planning Officer presented the report which proposed minor works to the existing building entrance which included replacing the existing lobby structure and canopy and the revision of existing parking configuration and external paving.”

“Councillor Pavitt proposed approval of the application, this was seconded by Councillor Freeman.”

Minutes

Decision

The committee authorised the Strategic Director of Planning to grant permission subject to the specified conditions.

“RESOLVED that the Strategic Director of Planning be authorised to grant permission for the development subject to the conditions set out in section 16 of the report.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Uttlesford Planning Committee minutes, 2 July 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Uttlesford's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Uttlesford
Date
Wednesday 2 July 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Recording
On the council's website
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)