155-home residential development at Land West Of Warburton Lane, Warburton
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Trafford Planning and Development Management Committee on 22 Jan 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought 155 homes with access, open space, landscaping, highways, drainage and other associated works.
“Full planning application for the erection of a residential development (155no units) together with access, open space, landscaping, highways and drainage infrastructure, and other associated works.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The 13.26-hectare greenfield site lies beyond Partington, beside Warburton Lane, within the New Carrington allocation and part of a historic deer park.
“The application relates to a 13.26ha, greenfield site located beyond the southern edge of Partington. The site is bound by Warburton Lane and lies on the site of a historic Deer Park. The site is located within the Warburton Area of the New Carrington strategic Places for Everyone plan allocation.”
“The site encompasses greenfield land currently in agricultural use. This is contained within a single field which is bound by the Red Brook, and associated mature woodland, to the North, the A6144 to the East and arable fields to the south. Most of this site was historically occupied as a medieval deer park known as Warburton Park which was created between 1248 and 1278.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
An earlier 400-home scheme was refused and dismissed on appeal, while other applications concerned a withdrawn 201-home scheme and footpath and cycleway works.
“115155/HYB/24 - Hybrid application comprising: A) application for full planning permission for 103 homes together with access, open space, landscaping, highways and drainage infrastructure and other associated works; and B): application for outline planning permission for up to 300 homes together with access, open space, landscaping, highways and drainage infrastructure and other associated works (appearance reserved on the outline element) Pending Consideration.”
“100093/FUL/20 - An application for a new footpath/cycleway including bridge connection over Red Brook and all associated works. Withdrawn 03.08.20.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the housing and regeneration benefits outweighed the identified harms, subject to a legal agreement and conditions.
“The main adverse impacts of this scheme are moderately weighted and relate to its shortcomings in terms of its suburban layout and integration with Partington, impact on heritage assets (neutral impact), the landscape impact and the impact on congestion along Manchester Road. However, the benefits are numerous and, in some cases, substantial.”
“The proposal is considered to be consistent with the Development Plan, as a whole, including policies within Places for Everyone, the Core Strategy, the NPPF, the draft Warburton Neighbourhood Development Plan, and the relevant supplementary planning documents/guidance including the newly adopted Trafford Design Code. The application is therefore recommended for approval subject to the completion of a legal agreement and the recommended conditions.”
Officer report
What consultees said
Several consultees raised no objection subject to conditions, while the Local Highway Authority, National Trust, parish councils and heritage officers raised objections or concerns.
“Local Highway Authority (LHA) – Objection. Application premature to New Carrington Masterplan and cannot comply with PfE Policy JPA30. Concerns raised re. traffic modelling and impact on congestion, walking/wheeling facilities and exceeding of maximum parking standards.”
“TBC Heritage and Urban Design Manager (HUDM) – Objection. Proposal causes less than substantial harm – ranging from negligible to moderate – to the significance of several designated and non-designated heritage assets. Concerns raised regarding the layout and design of the development (as submitted).”
Officer report
What residents said
Objections covered the masterplan, traffic, design, landscape, services, flooding, pollution, farmland, ecology, construction and affordable housing.
“- Existing traffic in Partington already problematic, particularly during roadworks. Addition of some 400 households likely to cause severe and continuous congestion. - Buses through Partington already delayed due to existing traffic. - Significant contribution required from the developer to fund necessary highways infrastructure including public transport. - Car-dependent urban sprawl.”
“- Increased flood risk in the area. - Doubt that Redrow build responsibly or value local people. - Construction impact including noise and dust disruption and access for heavy machinery along rural lanes. - Cumulative impact of pollution from multiple developments ignored. - Lack of commitment to deliver truly affordable homes, and 15% provision is insufficient.”
Officer report
The committee vote
A motion to defer determination was moved and seconded but lost when put to the vote.
“It was moved and seconded that determination of the application be deferred.”
“The motion was put to the vote and declared lost.”
Minutes
Sources
- Trafford Planning and Development Management Committee minutes, 22 January 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Trafford's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Trafford
- Date
- Thursday 22 January 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Trafford committee decisions →
This committee's year
33 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.