Window and cladding replacement at 1, 2 4 And 12 Love Lane, Margate

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Thanet Planning Committee on 18 Jun 2025.

F/TH/25/0302Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed replacing windows, doors and cladding at four dwellings, using timber double glazing at the front and side and UPVC at the rear.

“LOCATION: Replacement of timber single glazed windows with timber double glazed to the front and side elevations, replacement of timber single glazed windows and doors to rear with double glazed UPVC together with replacement of cladding…”

Officer report

The site and history

The site contains four late-1980s dwellings in terraces, and an earlier application for replacement windows and doors was granted in 2012.

“The site comprises four dwellings, three located on the northern side of the road and one located on the southern side. Dwellings on both sides of the road form part of a terrace of dwellings with similar designs and appear to have been constructed in the late 1980s.”

“F/TH/12/0387 - Replacement of timber windows and doors with aluminium and UPVC. Granted 16 July 2012”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended approval because the proposal would not significantly harm the conservation area, living conditions, highway safety, biodiversity or flood risk.

“This development would not significantly alter the scale or arrangement of the buildings and is, therefore, not considered to result in any significant harm to highway safety in the area.”

“The site is located within Flood Zone 2 and is, therefore, at a medium risk of flooding. This proposal would not alter the arrangement or use of the site and is, therefore, not considered to change the flood risk associated with the existing use.”

Officer report

Consultation and responses

Letters, a site notice and a newspaper advert were used, no responses were received, and the conservation officer raised no objection.

“Letters were sent to neighbouring property occupiers, a site notice was posted close to the site and an advert was posted in the local paper.”

“TDC Conservation Officer - Following a review of the submitted application and revised plans, given that the street facing (front and side) elevations will retain timber frames, and the proposed rear windows will not be visible from public viewpoint within the conservation area, I raise no objection.”

Officer report

Design and conservation

Front and side timber frames would remain, rear windows would not be prominent from public areas, and replacement cladding would match the existing material.

“The amended plans indicate that the single glazed timber windows on the front and side elevations would be replaced with double glazed timber windows to match the existing. The proposed windows would still have the same method of opening and a similar appearance to the existing windows, however the change from single glazing to double glazing would alter their appearance and mean that they do not match the existing windows.”

“The single glazed windows and doors to the rear of the buildings would be replaced with white UPVC doors and windows. The rear elevation of the buildings are not visible from the highway, however parking courts are located at the rear of each building which allow for views of the rear elevations from this shared area.”

Officer report

The committee vote

Councillors proposed and seconded approval subject to three conditions, and the motion was carried.

“Councillor Makinson proposed and Councillor Boyd seconded that the officer recommendation for approval be agreed, subject to the following conditions:”

“When put to the vote the motion was CARRIED.”

Minutes

The decision

The application was approved subject to a three-year commencement limit, approved drawings, and matching colour, finish and texture for the cladding.

“2 The development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with the submitted drawings numbered 24/699/MG/PL01 Rev C and 25/699(12)/MG/PL01 Rev C received, 22 May 2025.”

“GROUND: To secure the proper development of the area. 3 The external materials and external finishes to be used in the replacement of the cladding hereby approved shall be of the same colour, finish and texture as those on the existing property.”

Minutes

Councillors at the meeting

Apologies John Dennis Independent, Marc Rattigan Conservative

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.

Sources

  • Thanet Planning Committee minutes, 18 June 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Thanet's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Thanet
Date
Wednesday 18 June 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Councillors
13Labour 9Conservative 2Green 2Show councillors
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

16 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →