16 apartments at Ivy Leaf Club & Inst Ltd, Hendon, Sunderland

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Sunderland Planning and Highways Committee on 30 Mar 2026.

25/00444/FULApproved

What was proposed

The application proposed converting a social club into 16 apartments, with a second-floor extension, new windows and rendered external walls.

“Proposal: Conversion of social club to 16no. apartments; including construction of second floor extension, provision of new windows and render to external walls (as amended)”

“The application seeks full planning permission for the conversion of social club to 16no. apartments; including construction of second floor extension, provision of new windows and render to external walls the Ivy Leaf Club, 38A Suffolk Street, Hendon, Sunderland, SR2 8JZ.”

Officer report

The site and building

The building was an existing social club in a built-up urban area, and a dormer extension had recently been added without apparent planning permission.

“The initial point to draw to attention would be that a dormer extension has recently been added to the building (around summer 23). The Agent has submitted two versions of the existing plans, one showing the building as previously and the another showing the dormer extension. Given that the dormer window does not appear to benefit from planning permission, the application will be determined on the basis of the pre-existing plans (i.e.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval with conditions and a legal agreement for contributions towards coastal recreation pressure and open space.

“* the successful completion of a legal agreement to provide off-site financial contributions to mitigate the increased recreational pressure upon the protected coastline and open space.”

“* There does not exist a mechanism to provide the relevant obligations which make the proposed development acceptable in planning terms - namely the provision of off-site financial contributions to mitigate the increased recreational pressure upon the protected coastline and open space.”

Officer report

Why officers supported it

Officers considered the residential principle acceptable, with suitable apartment sizes, improved amenity, acceptable highways impacts and limited heritage effects.

“The Core Strategy, at policy BH1, also says that "development should... ensure a good standard of amenity for... future occupiers of land and buildings". The recently amended plans show that the main rooms in each apartment would have a window with a good outlook, albeit the windows for the bedrooms of the second apartment look into the back lane between Atholl Road and Hendon Burn Avenue.”

“In terms of the detailed impacts, the proposed development would accord with the relevant policies within the development plan for amenity, drainage, ecology (subject to the completion of a legal agreement), groundworks, heritage and highways and there are not any material considerations which indicate a decision should be made otherwise.”

Officer report

Consultees and objections

The highway authority, contaminated land, fire, flood and heritage consultees raised no objections, while ecology recommended a contribution and police retained concerns about design issues.

“Local Highway Authority - "no objections to the proposal on highway grounds".”

“Northumbria Police - "Though some of the security issues have been addressed it is our belief that the new design has created other issues which will need to be addressed before Northumbria Police can consider removing our objection to the development".”

Officer report

What members discussed

Councillors asked whether the applicant could be contacted more proactively because of the building’s condition, and discussed enforcement and completion timescales.

“The Chairperson thanked the Officer for their presentation and opened up the meeting for questions from Members.”

“In response to Councillor Dixon’s request if more proactive contact could be had with the applicant bearing in mind the condition of the building, the Planning Officer advised that there was a condition for the development to be…”

Minutes

The committee vote

Members agreed to the officer recommendation without any recorded opposition.

“There being no further questions or comments, the Chairperson put the Officer’s recommendation, as set out in the report, to the Committee and with all Members being in agreement it was:-”

Minutes

The decision

The committee approved the apartments subject to conditions and a legal agreement, with refusal required if the agreement was not completed by 26 June 2026.

“OR (ii) If the points within (i) have not been satisfactorily completed by 26 June 2026, then REFUSE planning permission for the reason below:”

Minutes

Sources

  • Sunderland Planning and Highways Committee minutes, 30 March 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Sunderland's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Sunderland
Date
Monday 30 March 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

14 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →