Rear extension and dormers at Dog Hill Farm, Mappleborough Green, Studley

What was proposed

The application proposed partly demolishing the conservatory, adding a single-storey rear extension and creating first-floor rooms with dormers.

“Application Ref. 24/01218/FUL Site Address: Dog Hill Farm, Birmingham Road, Mappleborough Green, Studley B80 7DF Description of Development:”

“Part demolition of existing conservatory, erection of single storey rear extension and creation of first floor accommodation with associated dormers…”

Officer report

Earlier planning history

Earlier permissions covered a replacement dwelling and single-storey side and rear extensions.

“Proposal Decision and date 10/02006/FUL Demolition of existing bungalow and erection of detached replacement dwelling. GRANTED 23.11.2010 10/01243/FUL Erection of single storey extensions to side and rear GRANTED 21.08.2010”

“A full planning history is available for the wider application on the SDC E- planning system.”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended approval, subject to conditions and notes, because the proposal was considered to accord with the development plan and be sustainable.

“Conclusion The development proposed is considered to accord with the development plan and represents a sustainable form of development. I can find no material planning considerations to warrant an alternative approach.”

“Conditions: The standard time limit condition for commencement of development 2. Development to accord with approved plans 3. Materials to accord with application form 4. Climate change compliance 5. Removal of schedule 2, Part 1, Classes B and C Permitted Development Rights (extensions and additions to the roof)”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The county ecology and highway authorities raised no objections, while the parish council objected to the proposal’s relationship with the street and neighbouring buildings.

“Parish Council - Mappleborough Green Object to the planning application as the development is not in keeping with the current street scene, it is not compatible with the general neighbouring building line, consisting of bungalows and one storey properties.”

Officer report

Who spoke

The parish council, the agent and the ward member spoke at the meeting.

The committee vote

A motion to grant permission in line with the recommendation was proposed and seconded, then passed with ten votes in favour and one abstention.

“Having considered the application and the representations made at the meeting, a Motion of GRANT, in accordance with the recommendation detailed in the report, was proposed by Councillor Adam and seconded by Councillor Ballinger.”

“Thereafter, by 10 votes in favour, with 1 abstention, it was…”

Minutes

The decision

The committee granted planning permission subject to the five conditions and two notes contained in the report.

“That Planning Application 24/01218/FUL be GRANTED subject to the following:”

“5 conditions contained in the report; and • 2 notes contained in the report.”

Minutes