Mixed industrial development at Land West And North West Of 8A - 8D Bandeath Industrial Estate Throsk
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Stirling Planning and Regulation Panel on 2 Sept 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought permission in principle for industrial, storage, distribution and business uses, with roads, parking, energy facilities and landscaping.
“Planning permission in principle for mixed use development comprising Class 6 (storage and distribution) including new warehousing and areas for outside storage, Class 5 (general industry) including workshops and industrial units, and Class 4 (business) new offices and light industrial units; new roads and hard surfaced parking areas for HGVs, trailers, and cars; energy related proposals including roof mounted solar panels, ground mounted solar panels, EV charging…”
“Planning Permission in Principle is sought for mixed use development comprising Class 6 (Storage and Distribution) including new warehousing and storage, Class 5 (General Industry) including workshops and industrial units, and Class 4 (Business) which includes new offices and light industrial units.”
Officer report
The site
The site is an open grassed field within Bandeath Industrial Estate, beside an industrial building, a road and land used for industry and agriculture.
“The site is located within Bandeath Industrial Estate at Throsk. The site is an open level grassed field. A pitched roof industrial building is adjacent with parking. There is a road along front of site. The boundary details are post and wire fencing. The adjoining land uses industrial and agriculture.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
There is no relevant previous history for the application.
“There is no history of relevance to this application.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval subject to conditions and a Section 75 agreement securing planning obligations.
“Recommendations Planning & Regulation Panel is asked to approve the application subject to the conditions and reasons as set out in Appendix 1, but to withhold issuing the Decision Notice until a Section 75 Legal Agreement has been completed securing the planning obligations.”
Officer report
Why officers supported it
The site is allocated for business and employment uses, and officers found no technical constraints or significant concerns about transport, flooding, noise, biodiversity or heritage.
“NPF4 Policy 26(a) (Business and industry), sets out that development for business and industrial uses on sites allocated for those uses in the LDP will be supported. Therefore, in principle, as this is an allocated site and the proposals which include business, industry, storage and distribution, these uses are in line with the LDP under Proposal B21 and therefore compliant with NPF4.”
“Summary of Assessment: The application site is located within the long established Bandeath Industrial Estate and is allocated in the LDP for the business, industry and storage and distribution uses proposed. The uses proposed along with the ancillary energy proposals complies with criteria in NPF 4 Policy 26 relating to business and industry. There are no technical constraints (flood risk, roads/traffic, noise, contamination, odour, air quality).”
Officer report
What consultees said
Roads and other consultees raised no objections, with conditions and a transport contribution requested in some responses.
“No objection subject to conditions and a financial developer contribution towards transport measures identified in the City Transport Plan.”
“NatureScot No objection subject to conditions.”
Officer report
What people said
Three representations were received: two objections and one neutral response, covering biodiversity, trees, grassland, roads, traffic and sustainable travel.
“Three competent representations have been received, two of which are objections and one neither in support nor objecting. The material planning matters are summarised below.”
“The application has merit with regard to protecting the Firth of Forth Special Protection Area (SPA). The comprehensive recommendations in the consultation reply from Naturescot should be taken into account. Retaining as many trees as possible. Planting additional trees and using native species for any landscaping would benefit biodiversity. Consider retaining existing grassland in parts of the site.”
Officer report
Members’ questions
Members asked officers a range of questions about the application after a presentation of maps and diagrams.
“The report by the Head of Economic Development, Planning & Climate Change asked Panel to determine planning application 24/00651/PPP which could not be determined under delegated powers and required to be determined by the Planning & Regulation Panel under the Scheme of Sub-Delegation. The Development Management Team Leader introduced the report with a presentation of maps and diagrams relating to the application.”
Minutes
Sources
- Stirling Planning and Regulation Panel minutes, 2 September 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Stirling's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Stirling
- Date
- Tuesday 2 September 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Stirling committee decisions →