40MW battery storage system at Gilbertfield Road, Cambuslang

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by South Lanarkshire Planning Committee on 28 Oct 2025.

P/25/0367Refused

What was proposed

The application sought a 40MW battery storage system with associated equipment, landscaping, fencing and an upgraded farm-track access.

“Construction and Operation of Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) with a capacity of 40MW and associated infrastructure and landscaping…”

“Description of Proposed Development 3.1 The proposed development involves the creation of a Battery Energy Storage system (BESS) with a capacity of 40MW. It would consist of battery storage units arranged in two rows, one parallel to the site’s southern boundary and the other parallel to the site’s eastern boundary. The containers have an overall height of 2.89m and would be finished in metal cladding. Other ancillary development associated with the proposal includes:-”

Officer report

The site and its setting

The site is a 1.9-hectare area of rough grassland in open farmland, near Cambuslang and Gilbertfield Castle, with access from the north.

“Site Description 2.1 The site lies approximately 380m to the south of the settlement edge of Cambuslang and comprises a roughly triangular area of rough grassland, extending to approximately 1.9ha in area and bounded on all sides by open farmland. The site was formerly a farm steading but it has been abandoned with some of the original buildings in a derelict state.”

“The land and surrounding area is generally flat and there is an intermittent hedgerow along the northern boundary of the site. Gilbertfield Castle (a scheduled monument) is located approximately 250m to the east of the site. There is an existing access to the site along an unmade access track from the residential area to the north.”

Officer report

Earlier planning history

An earlier application to demolish the farm buildings and build 15 houses was refused in March 2023.

“Relevant Planning History 4.1 A planning application (P/20/0548) to demolish the farm buildings and the erection of 15 houses was refused planning permission on 29 March 2023.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended refusal because the Green Belt location was not justified, the development would harm landscape and residential amenity, and local economic benefits were limited.

“However, for the reasons noted above, it is considered that the use of a site within the designated Green Belt for this development has not been sufficiently justified and, as such, the proposal would represent the unjustified development of a Green Belt site due to a specific locational need not being demonstrated and the adverse impact on the character and visual amenity of the surrounding area.”

“1: The proposed development is contrary to Policy 18 – Renewable Energy of the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2) as the proposals cannot be justified against the terms of the relevant assessment criteria and that accordingly, the proposed development is also considered to be contrary to the terms of Policy 4 – Green Belt and Rural Area of the SLLDP2.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Council services and specialist consultees raised no objection, subject to conditions on noise and site investigation works where applicable.

“Consultations 6.1 Environmental Services – no objection subject to conditions relating to noise. Response: Noted.”

“West of Scotland Archaeology Service (WoSAS) – no objection to the proposed development subject to conditions dealing with site investigation works. Response: Noted.”

Officer report

Residents’ views

There were 201 objections and one supporting letter, with objections covering disturbance, landscape, fire risk, noise, property values and alternative sites.

“Representations 7.1 Following the statutory period for neighbour notification and publicity, a total of 201 letters of objection to the proposed development have been received, together with 1 letter of support.”

“Disturbance to adjacent residential areas during the construction of the proposed development • Adverse impact upon the local landscape • Adverse impact arising from potential fire risks associated with the operation of the development • Adverse impacts on the adjacent residential areas arising from noise associated with the operation of the development • Negative impacts on house prices • Lack of consideration to more appropriate alternative locations for the proposed…”

Officer report

Committee discussion

The committee discussed the application, and an officer answered a member’s question about the report.

“There followed a discussion on the application during which an officer responded to a member’s question on an aspect of the report.”

Minutes

The committee’s decision

The committee refused the application for the reasons set out in the officer recommendation.

“The Committee decided: that planning application P/25/0367 by GPC 678 Limited for the construction and operation of a battery energy storage system (BESS) with a capacity of 40MW and associated infrastructure and landscaping at land 290 metres west southwest of Gilbertfield Farm, Gilbertfield Road, Cambuslang be refused for the reasons detailed in the Executive Director’s report.”

Minutes

Sources

  • South Lanarkshire Planning Committee minutes, 28 October 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of South Lanarkshire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Tuesday 28 October 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

9 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →