6 to 8 bed HMO at 9 Rhode Lane, Bridgwater

“The Planning Officer introduced the application with the aid of a presentation. The Officer explained that the application was to consider for the erection of single storey rear extension to add an additional bedroom, and a proposed change of use from a C4 6 bed HMO Dwelling to sui generis 8 Bedroom HMO.”

“Councillors expressed strong concern about the growing concentration of HMOs in the area and felt the proposal represented overdevelopment, even though it was an increase from six to eight occupiers. Officers advised that the lawful use of the property is already as a 6-bed HMO, which must carry significant weight, the application related only to the increase from six to eight occupants, not the principle of HMO use itself, which had already been established.”

“Councillors raised concern that two additional residents were likely to result in additional vehicles, worsening congestion and inconvenience to existing residents. Officers explained that the site is in a sustainable location within Bridgwater, close to services and public transport, and therefore reliance on private vehicles was expected to be lower.”

“Councillors expressed concern that existing residents were already experiencing pressure and that the proposal would exacerbate this. Officers confirmed that bedroom sizes and internal layouts met relevant standards and that external works would not cause overlooking or loss of privacy. • Councillors commented on the appearance of works to the rear of the property, particularly the dormer and queried whether the proposal harmed the character of the terrace.”

“After a short adjournment Councillor Smedley proposed to refuse planning permission. This was seconded by Councillor Bruce. Wording to be agreed with the Chair and Officers.”

“Having been duly proposed and seconded the Planning Committee resolved that the Planning Committee resolved that the Planning Application be REFUSED planning permission; the final wording of this condition to be delegated to the Area Planning Manager in consultation with the Chair of the Planning Committee – North.”

“The proposed development would result in an unacceptable intensification of the existing use of the site by reason of its nature, scale, and location. The proposal would fail to be responsive to and reinforce local context, character, scale and distinctiveness of place and would generate increased parking demand where there is limited off street capacity.”