107 homes at Land south of Mansfield Road, Aston

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Rotherham Planning Board on 26 Feb 2026.

RB2024/1431Approved

The meeting was recorded; the recording is on the council's website.

What was proposed

The application sought 107 homes with associated highways, landscaping, open space and drainage, reduced from an initial proposal for 111 homes.

“This application seeks full planning permission for the erection of 107 dwellings and associated highways, landscaping, open space and drainage infrastructure. This has been reduced from the initial request for a scheme of 111 dwellings.”

“There is an area of public open space along the southern boundary of the site, this includes recreational space, sustainable drainage infrastructure, a LEAP and a landscape buffer that includes new and retained trees along the southern boundary, with a native shrub mix proposed to be planted around them.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The 3.86-hectare site is an agricultural field south of Aston, bounded by roads, fields, trees, hedgerows and an industrial estate.

“The site comprises a single agricultural field, which is enclosed by hedgerow and trees to the north and west, and the A57 to the south. To the east, the site adjoins a further field and to the west is the Mansfield Road Industrial Estate, comprising a range of industrial buildings and open storage areas.”

“The site’s topography slopes downwards from north to south. Telecoms wires cross the site with a pole present in the centre of the site.”

Officer report

Planning history

There were no previous applications for this site, while an application for 140 homes on land to the east had been withdrawn.

“There have been no previous applications submitted relating to this site, however there was an application on the site to the east the details are:”

“RB2019/1932 – Erection of 140 no. dwellinghouses including access, associated infrastructure, landscaping, public open space and parking – WITHDRAWN – 22 January 2026”

Officer report

Why officers supported it

Officers considered the housing benefits, lack of five-year housing supply and employment-land evidence outweighed impacts that could be mitigated by conditions and contributions.

“Further to the above the Council cannot evidence a five-year supply of housing land and as such the “tilted balance” as set out in paragraph 11 of the Framework is engaged which shifts the presumption in favour of approval and requires adverse impacts that "significantly and demonstrably" outweigh the benefits to refuse a scheme.”

“Therefore, in light of the above and together with the issues raised by the objectors it is considered there is no reasonable planning justification to refuse the application and subject to conditions and the signing of the s106 to secure the contributions, the application would comply with relevant national and local planning policies and guidance and is subsequently recommended for approval.”

Officer report

What consultees said

Most consultees raised no objections, subject mainly to conditions or contributions for transport, affordable housing, drainage, ecology, education, health and sports pitches.

“RMBC Affordable Housing Officer: No objections subject to provision of affordable dwellings on site.”

“RMBC Ecology: No objections subject to conditions.”

Officer report

Main planning issues

The assessment considered the principle of housing, design, amenity, highways, landscape, ecology, open space, flooding, infrastructure, land stability and planning obligations.

“Principle • Design, Scale and Appearance • General Amenity • Highways • Public Rights of Way • Air Quality • Landscapes and Trees • Ecology and Biodiversity…”

“Green Spaces • Flood Risk and Drainage • Affordable Housing • Impact on Education / GPs • Minerals • Land Contamination and Soil Resources • Coal Authority • Archaeology • Planning Obligations • Issues raised by objectors • Other Considerations…”

Officer report

The committee decision

The committee resolved to grant permission subject to the legal agreement and report conditions, with an amended condition about earthworks, levels, retaining structures and materials management.

“(b) subject to the satisfactory signing of the agreement application RB2024/1431 be granted for the reasons adopted by Members at the meeting and subject to the relevant conditions listed in the submitted report and subject to an amendment to Condition No.33 which should now state:-”

“Prior to commencement of any above ground works, details of any cut and fill earthworks required to create development platform(s), including detailed topographical survey information and proposed finished site levels and any retaining walls and structures shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. This shall include the submission of a Materials Management Plan as required by the CL:AIRE guidance.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Rotherham Planning Board minutes, 26 February 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Rotherham's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Rotherham
Date
Thursday 26 February 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Recording
On the council's website
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

13 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →