Anaerobic digestion facility at Former Skipton on Swale Airfield, Sandhutton, Thirsk
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by North Yorkshire Strategic Planning Committee on 10 Feb 2026.
No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.
What was proposed
An anaerobic digestion facility was proposed with associated access, infrastructure, landscaping and engineering works.
“NY/2025/0048/ENV Proposed anaerobic digestion facility associated access, infrastructure, landscaping and engineering works at former Skipton on Swale Airfield, Sandhutton, Thirsk, YO7 4EG on behalf of Advanced Fuel Partners…”
“The Head of Development Management – Community Development Services sought determination of a planning application for an anaerobic digestion facility associated access, infrastructure, landscaping and engineering works at former Skipton on Swale Airfield, Sandhutton, Thirsk, YO7 4EG on behalf of Advanced Fuel Partners.”
Minutes
Public views
Fourteen further local objections and a follow-up parish council email were received, raising no issues not already addressed.
“By way of an update, the planning officer advised that since publication of the report, a further 14 local objections and a follow up email from Sandhutton Parish Council had been received, none of which raised any issues not already addressed in the report.”
Minutes
Who spoke
A local objector spoke against the application, while the agent and landowner spoke in support.
The committee’s discussion
Members discussed the tanks’ visual impact, CHP, traffic routes, pipeline connection, bridge capacity, waste management and vehicle hours.
“Operating hours for vehicle movements. Members debated whether proposed hours (07:00–19:00) should be reduced. Some Members supported restricting movements to 07:00–18:00; another Member requested more evidence before altering hours due to potential impacts on school traffic.”
“Members acknowledged that the proposed facility addressed a significant agricultural waste issue and that the applicant had provided credible information regarding pipeline connection, transport routing, and CHP demand. Concerns remained regarding traffic impacts and bridge capacity (which officers would check with Highways), with differing views on appropriate vehicle movement hours.”
Minutes
The vote
Members approved the motion to grant permission with amended weekday transport hours; seven voted for, four against and one abstained.
“It was then moved and seconded to approve the recommendations in the officer report with an amendment to Condition 3 in respect of transport operational hours that Monday to Fridays the operation of delivery and mobile plant transport shall only take place between 07:00 – 18:00 hours.”
“Voting record: Seven in favour, four against and one abstention.”
Minutes
The decision
Planning permission was granted subject to the listed conditions, amended Condition 3 and completion of a unilateral undertaking.
“The decision: That planning permission be GRANTED subject to conditions listed in the report (with the amendment to Condition 3 as detailed above) and subject to completion of a Unilateral Undertaking with terms detailed in Table 1 of the report.”
Minutes
Sources
- North Yorkshire Strategic Planning Committee minutes, 10 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of North Yorkshire's committee minutes. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- North Yorkshire
- Date
- Tuesday 10 February 2026
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 7 for, 4 against, 1 abstained
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- North Yorkshire committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.