One self-build dwelling at Blue Bay, Upper Claypark, Mortehoe, Woolacombe
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by North Devon Planning Committee on 4 Feb 2026.
The site and its setting
The site was an elevated plot in the Woolacombe Conservation Area and National Landscape, visible from surrounding areas and coastal viewpoints.
“The Blue Bay Guest House is a one and a half storey chalet bungalow, with later extensions, set in an elevated plot on Upper Claypark.”
“The site is within the Woolacombe Conservation Area and the Protected Landscape (formerly known as Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty). The building is highly visible in medium and long-range views from both within the Conservation Area, and from without, particularly the open hillside to the east and south.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended refusal because the design, scale and appearance would harm the Conservation Area, National Landscape and natural beauty, outweighing the benefits.
“In acknowledgement of the comments raised by the Conservation Officer and the North Devon Coast National Landscape Partnership, concerns are raised by Officers that the development will result in a building of a massing and appearance that would not respect the character and appearance of the locality.”
“In having regard to the above, it is recommended that the proposed development, by reason of its design, scale and appearance would not preserve or enhance the significance of the Conservation Area as a designated heritage asset, or conserve or enhance the landscape character, natural beauty and special qualities of the National Landscape.”
Officer report
Consultees and residents
The ward member and National Landscape comments objected on visual, landscape and heritage grounds, while the parish council proposed approval and no neighbour comments were initially received.
“The proportion of building to undeveloped land on the plot will be substantially altered by the development. The balance of landscape to building in the wider landscape will still be changed, diminishing the landscape flow through the Conservation Area and the visual connection between the coast and the surrounding hills, as observed from National Trust access land, the SWCP and the beach.”
“Heritage & Conservation Officer Reply Received: 04/07/2025 This application is the latest in a series which have proposed development for this site. The current application is for one new house, to replace a garage. The whole site is within the Woolacombe Conservation Area in an elevated position, on the southern slope of the northern flank of Combesgate Valley.”
Officer report
Who spoke
A supporter’s statement was read out, and the applicant, agent and ward member addressed the committee in support.
The committee vote
The committee approved the application by seven votes to two, with two abstentions, subject to delegated planning conditions.
“RESOLVED (7 for, 2 against and 2 abstained) that the application be APPROVED subject to the Service Manager (Development Management) being delegated authority to attach the associated planning conditions.”
Minutes
Why it was approved
The committee considered the passive-house design, reduced carbon emissions, public benefit and good design would enhance the Conservation Area and protected landscape.
“The Committee took into consideration the design, that the passive house would reduce carbon emissions, it was publicly beneficial and that the proposal would significantly enhance the conservation area through good design. It considered that the proposal was acceptable and in accordance with the following policies of the North Devon and Torridge Local Plan:”
“(a) Policy ST04 – that the development was of high quality and a sustainable design; (b) Policy ST09 – that the proposal did not conflict with policy 7 of ST09 and it was an improvement and did not detract; (c) Policy ST14 – that the development protected and enhanced the natural environment; (d) Policy ST15 – that the proposal does preserve and enhance the historic environment; (e) Policy DM04 – that it was a good design in terms of a new development, creation of places and…”
Minutes
The members' reasons
“The Committee also considered that although there were two previous applications for refusal on this site there were no material considerations worthy of sufficient weight which would indicate a decision other than that above.”
Minutes
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Sources
- North Devon Planning Committee minutes, 4 February 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of North Devon's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- North Devon Planning Committee
- Council
- North Devon
- Date
- Wednesday 4 February 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Approved, against officer advice
- Vote
- 7 for, 2 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- North Devon committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
29 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.