Replacement dwelling at 364 Newry Road, Newry

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Newry Mourne Down Planning Committee on 17 Sept 2025.

LA07/2024/0548/FApprovedAgainst officer advice

What was proposed

The application proposed replacing an existing two-storey detached dwelling with a new dwelling to its north west.

“Characteristics of the Site and Area The application seeks to replace an existing two storey detached dwelling with the new dwelling proposed to the north west of the dwelling to be replaced. The proposed site is part of a larger agricultural field and as such has no existing northern, western or eastern site boundaries. Both the existing dwelling and dwelling to be replaced are accessed via an existing laneway from…”

“Description of Proposal Replacement dwelling.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site lies in a larger agricultural field outside settlement limits and within an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, accessed by an existing laneway.

“Newry Road. The site is located outside any defined settlement limits and within an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.”

Officer report

Earlier planning history

Earlier permissions covered a farm dwelling, changes to its house type and renewals of previous approvals.

“LA07/2022/1271/F- Farm dwelling approved in substitution to LA07/2018/1980/F, LA07/2017/01551/F and P/2010/0264.”

“LA07/2018/1980/F- Change of house type with associated landscaping and site works in substitution of that previously approved under application LA07/2017/0551/F. Permission granted.”

Officer report

Why officers recommended refusal

Officers found that the proposed off-site position did not show landscape, heritage, access or amenity benefits and relied on new landscaping for integration.

“The proposal is considered to Policy CTY3 in that it has not been shown that the proposed dwelling could not be sited within the existing curtilage with an extension facilitated and that the proposed site would not result in demonstrable landscape, heritage, access or amenity benefits.”

“Policies CTY 13 and CTY14 Policy CTY 13 states that planning permission will be granted for a building in the countryside where it can be visually integrated into the surrounding landscape and it is of an appropriate design. Policy CTY14 seeks to ensure new buildings will not cause a detrimental change to, or further erode the rural character of an area.”

Officer report

Consultation and representations

No neighbour submissions were received, while consultees raised no concerns that prevented the scheme from being considered acceptable on water, ecology or roads matters.

“NIEA- o 23/01/25- NED acknowledges receipt of a Biodiversity Checklist and Bat Surveys carried out in 2022 and advises, due to the lapse in time clarification is sought from the Ecologist that no material changes has occurred since the original surveys took place o 27/02/25- NED acknowledges receipt of updated Biodiversity Checklist & a Bat Survey Report and refers the Planning Authority to the DAERA Standing Advice – NED – Single Dwellings, should any specific concerns be…”

“Summary of Issues: No objections or submissions from neighbours have been received and consultees have not raised concerns with the scheme.”

Officer report

What members considered

Councillor Rice said the relevant countryside policies were satisfied, the landscaping and integration were comparable, and the proposal reflected the established development pattern.

“Councillor Rice proposed that the application be overturned to an approval. He stated that he believed Policies CTY 1, 3 and 13 were satisfied and further advised that the proposed location had comparable landscaping and integration requirements to the Planning Department’s preferred location. He confirmed that, being familiar with the area, he considered the proposed development to reflect the established pattern of development. This was seconded by Councillor Hanna.”

Minutes

The final decision

The committee approved the application contrary to the officer recommendation and authorised officers to impose relevant conditions.

“AGREED: On the proposal of Councillor Rice, seconded by Councillor Hanna, it was agreed to issue an approval in respect of planning application LA07/2024/0548/F contrary to officer recommendation as contained in the Case Officer Report.”

“It was also agreed that Planning Officers be delegated authority to impose any relevant conditions.”

Minutes

The members' reasons

The minutes do not record the members' reasons for departing from the officers' recommendation.

Sources

  • Newry Mourne Down Planning Committee minutes, 17 September 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Newry Mourne Down's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Wednesday 17 September 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Approved, against officer advice
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

6 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →