Single-storey dwelling at Land To The North Of 29 Main Road, Portskewett

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Monmouthshire Planning Committee on 7 Oct 2025.

DM/2025/00379Approved

The site and surroundings

The site is a triangular paddock within the development boundary, with woodland, an access track, nearby homes, a public right of way and surrounding fields.

“The site which is to the north of Main Road in Portskewett, covers approximately 0. 9ha including 0.23 ha of woodland. There is a track into the site between nos. 27 and 29 Main Road. The site is located within the Portskewett Development Boundary. The access track is within an Archaeologically Sensitive Area. The site is not in a designated flood zone identified in the DAM maps of TAN 15 or the Flood Maps for Planning.”

“The owner of the fields behind the site has a right of access over the access track and along the south-west boundary to an existing field gate in the northwest corner.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the proposal was considered policy-compliant, sustainable and acceptable in design, amenity, highway, drainage and biodiversity terms.

“In conclusion, the application is considered to be policy compliant in all respects and is presented to Committee Members with a recommendation for approval.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The community council and consultees raised no objection, including highways, flooding, ecology, trees, archaeology, drainage and public rights of way officers.

“Portskewett Community Council - no objection, recommend approval.”

“Welsh Water - No objection. The site lies within the catchment of Nash WwTW where we can confirm there is sufficient hydraulic capacity to accommodate the foul flows and foul flows only from this network. No amount of surface water will be permitted to communicate directly or indirectly with the public combined sewerage system.”

Officer report

Residents’ views

Eight addresses objected over highways, parking, wildlife, privacy, access, precedent and loss of green space, while seven addresses supported the proposal.

“Letters of objection received from 8 addresses. This is agricultural land Highway Safety and Traffic Concerns Adverse impact on wildlife including badgers Dangerous access into the site, opposite to Wedgewood Drive On-street parking May set a president Loss of privacy Previous access into the site was refused Loss of view Impact on the footpath Loss of visibility due to cars parked on the road Wildlife - the badger reports seem to lack evidence and is inconclusive even…”

“The applicant has made great efforts in improving the environment for future benefit to wildlife and appearance for local residents The build would be for the applicant’s disabled wife I would rather a single storey build as opposed to a small scale housing development that would result in more traffic, noise and impact on the environment The development has been designed taking into account the privacy of the neighbouring property, with the proposed tree planting along the…”

Officer report

The committee debate

The application was proposed and seconded for approval with the report’s conditions, the Section 106 Agreement and an additional external-lighting condition.

“We considered the report of the application and late correspondence which was recommended for approval subject to the conditions outlined in the report and subject to a Section 106 Agreement.”

“In noting the detail of the application and the views expressed, it was proposed by County Councillor Ann Webb and seconded by County Councillor Emma Bryn that application DM/2025/00379 be approved subject to the conditions outlined in the report and subject to a Section 106 Agreement with an additional condition to add external lighting.”

Minutes

The vote

All thirteen voting members supported approval, with no votes against and no abstentions.

“Upon being put to the vote, the following votes were recorded:”

“For approval - 13 Against approval - 0 Abstentions - 0”

Minutes

The decision

The application was approved subject to the report’s conditions, a Section 106 Agreement and an additional condition concerning external lighting.

“We resolved that application DM/2025/00379 be approved subject to the conditions outlined in the report and subject to a Section 106 Agreement with an additional condition to add external lighting.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Monmouthshire Planning Committee minutes, 7 October 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Monmouthshire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Tuesday 7 October 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

13 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →