Airbnb holiday let at Rosewood A48 Chepstow Garden Centre To Pwllmeyric Hill, Pwllmeyric

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Monmouthshire Planning Committee on 9 Sept 2025.

DM/2024/01513Approved

What was proposed

The existing flat above a double garage would become holiday-let accommodation for one group of up to three people, without building alterations.

“Proposal: This is an existing double garage with flat over, approved under application number DM/2021/01503. The application seeks to change the use of the flat to an air b&b. There will be no construction or alteration to the internal layout as approved. The bnb will let out to a 1 car family, couple or party of max 3 people. The building had building regulation approval upon completion of construction in 2023.”

“This current full application seeks the change of use of the first floor flat into holiday let accommodation. The proposal does not involve any alterations to the building and the garage on the ground floor would be retained. The existing vehicular access will be utilised. The flat is located within the roof space of the garage and has an internal floor area of approximately 7 metres by 4.4 metres.”

Officer report

The site

The site is a detached home and garage within the settlement boundary, beside a public footpath and near protected trees and heritage assets.

“Rosewood is a detached, two-storey dwelling accessed via a section of private drive to the north of the A48. The site is within the settlement boundary as identified by the Monmouthshire Local Development Plan (LDP) and is within a residential area. The site is adjacent to a limestone safeguarding area, a main village site as allocated by the LDP and a Cadw Registered Area. There is a group TPO which covers three pine trees on the site (TPO REF; MDC:3/G5).”

“In November 2022 Planning permission was granted for alterations to the dwelling which included a detached double garage with a flat above. That garage has now been built. It measures approximately 8.1m by 7.8m, it is finished in white render and has a dormer window on the front elevation.”

Officer report

Earlier planning decisions

Permission was granted for the garage and flat, with later approvals covering tree works, biodiversity measures and drainage.

“DM/2023/00005 Discharge of condition 5 (schedule of biodiversity enhancement measures) for planning Decision DM/2021/01503.”

“DM/2023/00231 Discharge of condition 8 relating to planning application DM/2021/01503: Plan showing Approved drainage scheme - JPCEJH-2021-001A.”

Officer report

What consultees said

The community council objected over the private drive and traffic, while highways, trees, public rights of way and other consultees raised no objection.

“Mathern Community Council – Objects. We are in support of local residents' concerns over the current state of the private driveway and the increased traffic this will encourage. We would request that this application be referred to committee for decision.”

Officer report

Objections and concerns

Two neighbours and the local member raised concerns about access, traffic, pedestrian safety, parking and whether the flat should count as a separate dwelling.

“Councillor Brown I am concerned about the sharing of the poor access to and from the A48 Pwllmeyric which is in a dangerous location not far from a bend and already serves 5 dwellings and the extra traffic that the air b and b will generate with those staying in the flat above the garage. Highways have not objected but have not commented on the pedestrians who also use this access for the PROW or the number of properties already sharing the access.”

“I object to this application as neighbours believe it is beyond the capacity of the dangerous and poor access/egress and the highways report does not appear to have taken all of these factors into consideration including the number of properties that already share this access, the pedestrian PROW which leads from this access, the access being used as a turning circle, the dangers of the busy A48 being close to a junction and near a bend so that it fails to provide safe and…”

Officer report

Committee consideration

Members considered the application, late correspondence and the views expressed before a proposal was made to approve it with the stated conditions.

“We considered the report of the application and late correspondence which was recommended for approval subject to the conditions outlined in the report.”

“In noting the detail of the application and the views expressed, it was proposed by County Councillor John Crook and seconded by County Councillor Tony Easson that application DM/2024/01513 be approved subject to the conditions outlined in the report.”

Minutes

The vote

The committee voted 14 for approval, one against and none abstaining, and the proposal was carried.

“Upon being put to the vote, the following votes were recorded:”

“For approval - 14 Against approval - 1 Abstentions - 0”

Minutes

Sources

  • Monmouthshire Planning Committee minutes, 9 September 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Monmouthshire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Tuesday 9 September 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

11 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →