2 dwellings at Land Adjacent Of "Kingsnorth", High Halstow, Rochester
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Medway Planning Committee on 14 Jan 2026.
No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.
Outline consent sought for two homes
The application sought outline planning consent, with appearance, landscaping and layout reserved, for two 2 storey dwellings with off-road parking.
“The Planner presented the application which sought outline planning consent with some matters reserved (appearance, landscaping, layout) for the construction of two, 2 storey dwellings with off road parking. The matters to be considered as part of the application, were therefore, the access for the development and its scale.”
Minutes
Officers recommended refusal
Officers recommended refusing the application.
“With the agreement of the Committee, Councillor Pearce addressed the Committee as Ward Councillor and outlined the following points in support of the officers recommendation to refuse the Application:”
Minutes
Ward councillor spoke in support of refusal
The Ward Councillor addressed the committee in support of the officer recommendation to refuse, backing the first and third reasons for refusal.
Habitat impact and biodiversity gain unresolved
The applicant had not assessed the impact on protected habitats or the bird mitigation payment, and had not shown the required 10% biodiversity net gain.
“He supported the reason for Refusal 1, noting its consistency with the earlier Sharnal Street application refused by the Committee. • He supported Reason for Refusal 3, as the applicant had not assessed the impact on protected habitats, leaving the extent of any potential harm unknown. In the absence of habitat assessment and the required Bird…”
“This record is available on our website – www.medway.gov.uk Wise mitigation payment, the Member stated that refusal was the only appropriate option. • There was a key difference from the previous proposal because the application was no longer for self-build and as such there was a statutory requirement for 10% Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG), and the application did not demonstrate compliance with the requirements, justifying the additional refusal reason.”
Minutes
Committee discussed report and councillor's points
The committee discussed the application, noting the officer's presentation, the report and the points raised by the Ward Councillor.
“The Committee discussed the planning application noting the officer’s presentation, the report and the points raised by the Ward Councillor.”
Minutes
Refused for three reasons
The application was refused for the three reasons set out in the report.
“REFUSED for the reasons 1 to 3 as set out in the report.”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Chrissy StampChairLabourFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Mark JonesVice-ChairLabourFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Kwashie AnangConservativeFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- David FieldLabourFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Phil FilmerConservativeFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Jim GilbourneConservativeFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Adrian GulvinConservativeFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Douglas HamandisheLabourFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Gareth MytonLabourFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Eddie PeakeLabourFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- John VyeReform UKFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Satinder ShokarSubstitute for HamiltonLabour
- Barry KempSubstitute for EtheridgeConservativeFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Lia MandaracasSubstitute for BowenLabourFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- John WilliamsSubstitute for PearceIndependentFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
The minutes record this decision with no vote against, so each member present for this item is shown as voting for it.
Apologies Gary Etheridge Conservative, Linda Bowen Labour, Paula Hamilton Labour, Michael Pearce Independent
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Medway Planning Committee minutes, 14 January 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Medway's committee minutes. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Medway Planning Committee
- Council
- Medway
- Date
- Wednesday 14 January 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Refused
- Councillors
- 15Labour 8Conservative 5Independent 1Reform UK 1Show votes
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Medway committee decisions →
This committee's year
35 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.