New homes at Land At Longhill Avenue, Gillingham, Chatham

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Medway Planning Committee on 26 Aug 2026.

MC/22/0486Approved

No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.

What was proposed

Construction of 16 dwellings, with new parking, landscaping, amenity space and a sustainable drainage system, was proposed.

“The Principal Planner outlined the application in detail for the construction of 16 dwellings, new parking, landscaping, amenity space, sustainable urban drainage system (SuDS), and associated works.”

Minutes

The officer's recommendation

A correction replaced the word 'refusal' with 'approval' in the recommendation section, and several conditions were updated to align with the revised National Planning Policy Framework.

“The Principal Planner brought Members’ attention to the supplementary agenda advice sheet which included updates to the report following publication of the revised National Planning Police Framework (NPPF) on 17 August 2026. The recommended conditions 4, 10, 11, 14, 17, 19, 23 had been amended to align with the updated NPPF, and that an additional condition (Condition 26) had been proposed.”

“Members were informed of corrections within the supplementary agenda advice sheet, including an amendment to the Climate Change and Energy Efficiency section of the report to reference paragraph 164 rather than paragraph 154, and the replacement of the word “refusal” with “approval” within the Recommendation section.”

Minutes

Parking raised in debate

Members raised concerns about the level of parking provision, and officers explained that service bays had been included to accommodate deliveries and servicing.

“During the debate, Members raised concerns regarding the level of parking provision proposed within the development. In response, the Service Manager – Development Management advised that service bays had been incorporated into the scheme to accommodate deliveries and servicing requirements.”

Minutes

What was decided

The application was approved, subject to a Section 106 agreement covering green space, education, community facilities, libraries, public realm, waste, sports and strategic coastal measures.

“This record is available on our website – www.medway.gov.uk iv. £3,768 towards libraries within the vicinity. v. £3,920 towards public realm to Chatham Centre. vi. £3,948.16 towards waste improvements. vii. £5,555.04 towards sports provision in the vicinity. viii. £5,602.56 towards strategic measures in respect of the coastal North Kent Special Protection Areas (SPAs)/Ramsar sites. ix. Meeting the Council’s costs. B.”

Minutes

Councillors at the meeting

The minutes record this decision with no vote against, so each member present for this item is shown as voting for it.

Apologies Gary Etheridge Conservative, Adrian Gulvin Conservative, Michael Pearce Independent

Also attending Smitha Campbell Labour, Dan McDonald Labour, Liubov Nestorova Labour, Louwella Prenter Labour, Elizabeth Turpin Independent, John Williams Independent

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.

Sources

  • Medway Planning Committee minutes, 26 August 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Medway's committee minutes. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Medway
Date
Wednesday 26 August 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Councillors
15Labour 8Conservative 5Independent 1Reform UK 1Show votes
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

This committee's year

80 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 7 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →