Battery energy storage system at Land West Of Lions Den, Hammerwich, Burntwood
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Lichfield Planning Committee on 21 Jul 2025.
What was proposed
The application proposed a battery energy storage system with supporting infrastructure, fencing, access, landscaping and biodiversity enhancements.
“Page 24 24/01169/FULM – Development of a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) with ancillary infrastructure, security fence, access, landscaping and biodiversity enhancements Land West Of Lions Den, Hammerwich, Burntwood, Staffordshire…”
Officer report
Updated consultation response
M6 Toll withdrew its objection after amendments to conditions covering fire safety and road restraint risk assessment.
“No development shall take place until an updated Fire Safety Report has been submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority, in consultation with Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service and the M6 Toll operator.”
“Prior to the commencement of any above-ground development hereby permitted, in accordance with DMRB CD377 a Road Restraint Risk Assessment Process (RRRAP) assessment shall be submitted to, and agreed in writing by, the Local Planning Authority in consultation with M6 Toll. Any roadside restraint measures identified in the RRRAP shall be implemented prior to the commencement of any above-ground development hereby permitted.”
Officer report
Objections received
Two representations and a petition objected over Green Belt development, openness, landscape, fire safety, public health, wildlife and biodiversity.
“Following the publishing of the committee report (including the appended committee report from the deferral), two new representations have been received, comprising one public representation and an updated comment from Hammerwich Parish Council. The two representations object to the proposal and contain the following new material planning considerations:”
“Inappropriate development in the Green Belt. • The proposal does not demonstrate Very Special Circumstances. • Harm to openness and landscape character. • Fire safety and public health risks. • The application threatens local wildlife habitats and does not provide information on biodiversity improvements. • The application will set a precedent for future development in the Green Belt.”
Officer report
Committee decision
The committee approved the application in line with the officers’ recommendations.
“RESOLVED: Approved in line with officers recommendations as set out in the report.”
“(Prior to Consideration of the Application, Representations were made by Councillor Leona Leung (Ward member)).”
Minutes
Sources
- Lichfield Planning Committee minutes, 21 July 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Lichfield's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Lichfield Planning Committee
- Council
- Lichfield
- Date
- Monday 21 July 2025
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Lichfield committee decisions →