Internally illuminated totem sign at Former Frankie And Benny's, Morecambe

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee on 23 Jun 2025.

25/00391/ADVApproved

What was proposed

The application sought consent for a six-metre internally illuminated, double-sided totem sign on a pole.

“This application (as amended) seeks advertisement consent for the display of an internally illuminated totem sign, measuring 6m in height comprising of a double-sided moulded acrylic face panel mounted on a pole.”

Officer report

The site and its setting

The site is a disused former restaurant beside commercial premises, a shared car park and cycle routes within a regeneration priority area.

“The site to which this application relates is the former Frankie & Benny’s building located off Central Drive, Morecambe. The building was originally constructed in the mid-1990s as a drive through Burger King takeaway. Frankie & Benny’s took over the site in 2008, removing the drive through and extending the building to provide a larger restaurant. Frankie and Benny’s vacated the site in 2020, and it has remained disused since then.”

“The site is located within the Morecambe Area Action Plan (MAAP) and is within a Regeneration Priority Area. The cycle path to the west and south forms part of National Cycle Routes 69, 700, and the Way of the Roses, and is also designated as an existing cycle route under Policy T2.”

Officer report

Earlier applications

Earlier permissions covered restaurant changes, site alterations and several illuminated signs, while a previous drive-through proposal was withdrawn.

“Application Number Proposal Decision 95/00530/FUL Erection of a drive through takeaway restaurant and video shop Approved 08/00836/FUL Alterations and extensions to existing Burger King restaurant to form Frankie & Benny's restaurant with ancillary bar Approved 22/01452/FUL Change of use of existing restaurant (Class E) to mixed use unit comprising of restaurant and drive thru takeaway (sui generis), demolition of existing single storey extensions to side and rear,…”

Officer report

Why officers supported it

Officers considered the amended sign acceptable because its height and design fitted the commercial area and it would not harm residential amenity or highway safety.

“The application relates to a replacement totem pole sign to reflect the branding of the proposed occupier. Originally, it was proposed that the totem would be 12 metres in height, approximately double the height of the existing totem frame and the Morrisons totem. This would have been out of character with the area and would have dominated views along Central Drive. The proposal has been amended with the height reduced to 6 metres and revised design.”

“Subject to the imposition of conditions to regulate the illumination and condition of the advertisement, and a condition to secure approval of the amended plans, the revised totem sign would not hamper any planned future upgrades to the cycle network nor impact highway safety. It is therefore acceptable in terms of public safety and conforms with the relevant policies listed above.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Morecambe Town Council objected to the original 12-metre totem, while County Highways raised no objection subject to illumination controls.

“Consultee Response Morecambe Town Council Objection to 12-metre-high totem (The Town Council have been re-consulted on the amended scheme in May 2025 and any observations will be reported to the Planning Committee).”

“Disproportionate to surroundings and raises a number of planning, public health, visual amenity and regeneration concerns. County Highways No objection to amended proposals, subject to condition controlling illumination. Property Services No response received.”

Officer report

The committee decision

The committee approved the application by 10 votes to one, with one abstention, subject to ten conditions covering plans, safety, maintenance, illumination and highways.

“That the application be approved subject to the conditions in the Committee Report.”

“Standard Advertisement Timescale. Amended Plans. Advertisement Standard Condition 1 (landowner permission). Advertisement Standard Condition 2 (public safety). Advertisement Standard Condition 3 (maintenance). Advertisement Standard Condition 4 (structure maintenance). Advertisement Standard Condition 5 (site restoration). Removal of Existing Advertisements. Luminance of Advertisements. Highways Condition.”

Minutes

Conditions

Approved subject to 5 conditions, set out in the minutes.

Sources

  • Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee minutes, 23 June 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Lancaster's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Lancaster
Date
Monday 23 June 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
10 for, 1 against, 1 abstained
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.

This committee's year

7 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →