415 homes at Land North Of Normandy Way, Hinckley

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Hinckley And Bosworth Planning Committee on 9 Sept 2025.

24/00264/OUTApproved

What was proposed

The application sought outline permission for up to 415 homes, with landscaping, open space, drainage, infrastructure and access from a new roundabout.

“The application seeks outline permission for the erection of up to 415 dwellings, open space, drainage, landscaping and associated infrastructure with all matters reserved except for access.”

“Dwellings predominantly two storey in height, with some ‘pepper-potting’ of up to 2.5 storeys • Access to the development will be via a new traffic island and access from Normandy Way on the southern site edge; • Main vehicle route through the scheme from the new traffic island, with secondary and tertiary routes radiating from; • Combined pedestrian and cycle route across the proposed scheme; • Formal public open space and informal pocket parks through the scheme; • Green…”

Officer report

Earlier planning decisions

Nearby housing proposals include 475 homes allowed at appeal, another 475-home scheme resolved for approval, and a reserved matters application awaiting consideration.

“22/00318/OUT - Outline planning application for the erection of up to 475 dwellings, including public open space, land reserved for a primary school together with future expansion land (Use Class F1(a)), drainage, landscaping and associated infrastructure – REFUSED – ALLOWED AT APPEAL (18 Jan 2024) (adjacent to the site)”

“25/00537/REM – Approval of reserved matters (appearance, landscaping, layout and scale) of outline planning permission 22/00318/OUT for construction of 475 dwellings and associated infrastructure and landscaping works – pending consideration…”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the housing and affordable homes benefits were considered to outweigh landscape harm and other adverse impacts, subject to safeguards.

“The Council cannot demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply and the housing policies in the adopted Core Strategy and the housing policies of the adopted SADMP are considered to be out of date as they focused on delivery of a lower housing requirement than is now required.”

“The scheme does not fully comply with Policy DM4 of the SADMP but the impact on landscape and visual amenity has been assessed and is considered to be medium for this development proposal. In addition, the provision of much-needed housing is considered to outweigh the landscape impact identified. Therefore, the adverse impact does not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits in this case.”

Officer report

Advice from consultees

Most consultees raised no objection or accepted the proposal subject to conditions, contributions, drainage measures, ecological safeguards and highway improvements.

“No objection has been received from: • Leicestershire Badger Group • Environment Agency • LCC Minerals and Waste Authority • LCC Archaeology…”

“Leicestershire Police (subject to a financial contribution as part of a S106 agreement) • LCC Tree Officer • HBBC Environmental Health (Conditions relating to noise, CEMP, land contamination, construction hours) • HBBC Drainage • HBBC Waste (Condition relating to refuse storage and collection) • LCC Drainage (Conditions relating to surface water drainage, management thereof and long-term maintenance thereof) • LCC Planning Obligations Team – subject to request for planning…”

Officer report

What members debated

Members were minded to approve but considered the proposed roundabout position inappropriate and wanted further attempts to move it.

“Whilst minded to approve the application, members felt that the position of the proposed roundabout was still inappropriate and that further attempts should be made to move it. It was moved by Councillor Bray and seconded by Councillor Bools that the decision be delegated to the Head of Planning following discussions on the position of the roundabout.”

Minutes

The committee vote

Members carried a motion to delegate the decision after further roundabout discussions and to require the reserved matters application to return to committee.

“(ii) Authority be delegated to the Head of Planning to issue the decision following further discussions in relation to the position of the roundabout;”

Minutes

What was decided

Members were minded to grant permission subject to National Highways withdrawing its objection, a legal agreement and the reported conditions.

“(i) Members be minded to grant permission subject to…”

Minutes

Sources

  • Hinckley And Bosworth Planning Committee minutes, 9 September 2025
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Hinckley And Bosworth's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Tuesday 9 September 2025
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)
Application
The application (council website)